Search results

correct. apparently the Eagles were going to send a limited amount of representatives. that is what I read... they offered to send only a handful of representatives... not necessarily players... https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/eagles/white-house-gives-its-side-canceled-eagles-visit...

if you saying - if you sell cakes you can't refuse to sell cakes to a gay person but at the same time you don't have to create a cake with a pro gay message on it... you are probably guessing where this current court is. its a very slippery slope but at least yesterday's decision avoided over...

I just quoted you the case.... read the pdf... the boston globe linked to the pdf. I don't know what mislead you but you are dead ass wrong...

that was the holding...not just an admonishment. what the hell case were you pretending to read. this is the ruling that stands... here is the holding... "For these reasons, the Commissions treatment of Phillip's case violated the States duty under the First Amendment not to base laws or...

and so if nobody wants to go... why pretend its a problem when they are no longer invited. this is another contrived bunch of faggoty leftist crap. its all about dividing the country to get a few more democrat votes... why would trump give some Eagles a bigger platform to slam him. and we got...

you have the holding 100 percent ass backwards.... the US Supreme court stated in a 7-2 decision the colorado govt commission was intolerant of the bakers religious rights. “The Civil Rights Commission’s treatment of his case has some elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the...

I keep seeing this money laundering accusation. its like the collusion. collusion is not a crime. there has to be an underlying crime. selling real estate to foreigners is not a crime... even if you sell a lot of it. imo, you have to complicit in the laundering for it to be a crime. (it may...

a link from drudge... https://europe.infowars.com/geert-wilders-to-spearhead-tommy-robinson-protest-in-london/ International protests on behalf of UK political prisoner Tommy Robinson gain momentum as Dutch MP Geert Wilders announces he will join the June 9th demonstration in London...

First of all.. and you clearly don't get this... 1. "abhorrent" (which is subjective and changes) non criminal behavior is exactly what the first amendment is here to protect. Had it not... you would not even be here to try and force gay marriage ideas on the baker. Gays would still be in...

the ever convincing kindergarten rules argument. very impressive scholarship piezoe. I take it you have no case law... but fortunately for you I studied and love international law which in the beginning International Law was very much based on the rules made by the big kids with the cookie jars...

another good point...

we had serious threads about this and in those threads i went through the issues of evidence and foundation and I predicted that issue would get into court. I was right it did. If I recall your previous posts you are referencing a short joking thread years before the election. you bring this...

link....

I am not arguing anything absurd or even what you claim piezoe. I point out there is no controlling case law or authority on this subject. Of course one will argue the Constitution already provides the sole mechanism for dealing with a President. And the otherside might argue the Constitution...

what kind of discourse is that? why create such a useless post? ok piezoe give the dispositive case law on this. Tell us Piezoe what is your authority for stating that a sitting President may be indicted. (I realize not a slogan type thought makes most of the lefties here queasy but I thought...

This is the top of fun some of us were hoping to have with Trump as President. Instead of all the rage... we should have been laughing at this type of stuff. Kanye West seemed to me losing his mind and we saw reports supporting that idea from the media...(I don't know much about hip hop)...

Once again you are out of your depth. only some forms of discrimination are illegal or not allowed. If you have a business you can choose how you wish to serve people. A lawyer does not have to take a personal injury or unlawful discrimination cases. Its a choice. A doctor does not have to...

his argument is weak... Its the weakest one I have seen him make. He seems biased on this. just because ken starr drafted an indictment, showed it to Clinton and Clinton then pleaded guilty does not mean that as a matter of law a President can be indicted. It could have been a bluff by...

many thumbs up...

Freedom is the ability to take you business anywhere you wish to anyone who wishes to work with you. Freedom is not attempting to force others using the govt or other force to do, say or think what you, your group or your religion demand. That is why we in America revolted against the Crown...