Search results

Do You still say that policy should be based on the Case Infection rate alone? Or do you need to know something else?

you have a problem with requiring that science policy be predicated on reproducible results? The other side of that debate is this woman Global Warming liar... I remind you that there is no peer reviewed papers showing that man made CO2 causes global warming as of the last time I searched...

you said or implied you could create policy based on only knowing the case fatality rate. yet that is illogical... because you have to know if the virus is going to infect significant portion of the population. you were wrong... very wrong... and now you are just introducing bullshit and...

John P.A. Ioannidis, MD, DSc Professor of Medicine, of Epidemiology and Population Health, and (by courtesy) of Biomedical Data Science, and of Statistics and Co-Director, Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA versus....GWB

This guy is an expert... He is saying... that at the time the given was there were not aware of any asymptomatic infections. In other words... policy is not based on the "case fatality rate" unless that is also the infection mortality rate. you have been lying your ass off... from the...

you are so full of shit.... what if the 90 percent rate had and R0 of 10 and the 20 percent had and R0 of .1 You know damn well you need to have an idea of how many people are going to be infected. You could have a 100 percent case fatality rate... but if only 100 people in the world will...

Wow was your claim off the charts uniformed.. no wonder you keep making the same damn wrong point. you don't understand how things work. Let me illustrate.... So you have an a virus with a case fatality rate of 90 percent ... And you have another with 20 percent case fatality rate... Which...

Would the "circumstantial evidence" be that the emails got out? (that is a real question... I would like to know the answer) Now if they didn't know the emails were stolen by Russian hackers .. who might have taken the emails? Why can't we question him?

you keep making that dumb misleading argument. Your experts (fauci and the media and governors) have been using what you call the case rate. They confused the fuck out of you.. and your team and many americans The real experts have been saying the proper ratio to use is what you call the...

Because the messenger is more important than the message to leftist. So here is what you missed... https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...x-lower-than-estimates-that-led-to-lockdowns/ Doctor to Senators: Coronavirus Fatality Rate 10 to 40x Lower than Estimates that Led to Lockdowns One of...

here is more from multiple other experts https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/05/07/doctor-to-senators-coronavirus-fatality-rate-10-to-40x-lower-than-estimates-that-led-to-lockdowns/

Here is real science from a Stanford professor to the Senate.... 10 to 40 times lower death rate.... we need herd immumity low risk must get back to work to acquire herd immunity... https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Testimony-Atlas-2020-05-06.pdf We now have an even greater...

My wife tells her medical friends are not afraid because they have been in hospitals and you can't really practice social distancing at all times. They are more fatalistic about catching it and are not too worried. Most are in good shape. Whereas many of her friends who have been locked down...

property fraud. The attorneys who filed that charge should be fired.

this is funny... look at the title the lefties gave this article and then look what the Sweden's chief actually said and then look at the graph... here is the real takeaway... after you cut through the spin. "Tegnell said that the number of admissions to Sweden’s hospitals is “clearly...

Your lockdown argument is not supported by historical facts because you don't have any facts showing wide work stoppages. As I said you pointed out some anecdotal evidence about limited shutdowns. You are now trying to argue they would have shutdown if they had been more interconnected...

Eugenics are supported by those who love strong powerful government action. You destroyed your own argument.

And I examined the links you gave me... they were anecdotal and weak and only applied to small regions. Your have provided nothing in the historical records to match the almost nationwide job shutdown.

I agree... For instance temperature rise and CO2. there is a strong correlation between the two. But, the peer reviewed science shows ocean temperature change precedes CO2 change. but now for suicides and the shutdown... Professors tell you to use your brain when setting up statistical...

now lefties... this is models vs models. your models were already proven to suck and lockdown has not really even ended yet. As we tally up the damage from lockdown... and we end the shutdown... Covid deaths will go up. Showing that the lockdown after the first few weeks may have done nothing...