Search results

..but you keep on doing so

Vhehn is right . There is evidence to support non believers. There is evidence there is no creator. There are facts which are proofs which lead to theories (scientific propositions containing and based on facts) which makes up substantial evidence, that there is not even a need for a...

As an inhabitant of the bizarre world of religious confusion, you are as such inevitably driven to rely on absurdity to try and argue in defense of the contradictions you make (no belief is belief) and in the lack of cognitive content you bring against any opposing views, as demonstrated above..

The Oxford English Dictionary doesn't agree with you. Soon no doubt, your internet dictionary will catch up.

You must have nearly EVERY one on ignore , so there is a reason and here is a dictionary definition of "accepted works" . Two reasons why you remain in ignorance... Oxford English Dictionary (OED), Second Edition atheism Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god...

My turn.. +1 :D

Attacking people for their non belief, the theist troll' s concept of freedom from religion and from persecution by the religious in America... ...even going so far as to suggest they made a euphemism for killing someone when "put down" (is a description for being laid in a cot like a baby)...

Exactly. It takes no brainpower . It's a thoughtless braindead statement you've made. Non belief in god is not - a belief. It's simply... non belief. Obviously it takes an unthinking half conscious theist to mindlessly extrapolate non belief into meaning belief. Conversation with...

lol :p

Both you and bugscoe have already established you both don't have a point. There's little need to keep on proving it.

... you seem completely ignorant of what it is you are actually saying.. Is god no longer supposed to be spiritual or mystical? Reject all claims of spiritual or mystical knowledge as Huxley suggests and you reject god. You should notice that's what theists will say an atheist does...

What? You say people who have no belief - do have a belief - because I ..... " won't answer a simple question " ?? If you want people to answer your questions, perhaps you could first , make a little sense and also, why not reciprocate in kind. I asked you this near the start of this...

Why do you insist in the ridiculous notion that someone who finds they have no reason to believe something, must therefore have belief?

You still don't understand what atheist is because you have the deluded idea it can only be one thing.

John, I deny that all Atheists believe in one or any particular thing . I deny that you can give an atheist belief because he has no belief. Someone without faith is not operating on faith. It's too silly an idea that it would not even be considered in any other field outside religion or by...

Barth, why not take off those religious specs for one sec and go look up Macroevolution. You will see , if you really try, Macroevolution is the combined and compounded effects of Microevolution over the evolved species. I suggest you stop reading Genesis into that every chance you get so...

A true agnostic has a disbelief in any claims of ultimate knowledge. Agnosticism is a denial of ultimate knowledge of the existence of God. From that standpoint an agnostic is a closet atheist. You appear to be portraying a blinkered view like that imposed by restrictive religious thinking...

I might have known you didn't have a point.

I take it then you don't agree with TraderZones in that ..."researched logic and be open minded yourself"... idea. Kindergarten debate is what you prefer? It's clear, someone who holds no rational motive for a belief in God, and therefore has no belief in God , does not have a belief -...

Not at all. Come on bugscoe, you don't have to believe there is no God to be an atheist. You can simply have no reason to believe there is. Having no reason to believe is not a belief.