Search results

So what's the problem exactly? You asked me if I know. I said Sure I know. Then you asked me for evidence about my knowledge. I make no claims about my knowledge. So you call me a liar. That's hardly anything like an intelligent response you have there is it. Nothing new then.

Let me spell it out for you. Firstly, you say someone has to be all knowledgeable to know about the existence or non existenece of God. So how come YOU know that about the existence or non existenece of God . Are you all knowledegable? Your argument is self-defeating and silly...

You asked me if I know. I said Sure. I gave you my answer. It's not a claim. You say you're not asking me to disprove anything and I make no claims about my knowledge. So why would you imagine there should be any reason for evidence of -not- when there is no evidence of -for- to begin with?

With no evidence for, what need for evidence against.

That'll be just YOUR "opinion"

Sure I know. Everything else must be just your "opinion" then.

It's fatuous to claim someone must have all the information in the universe to know if God exists or not. How do you know it is correct to claim that ? Do YOU have all the information in the universe? Of course you don't need to know everything to know some things. The problem is there's...

Making bad analogy and trying to pretend no belief is belief is piss poor argument for anything.

Bad analogy. Math is proven to solve previously unsolved questions relating to math problems. Unsolved questions solve nothing, including not solving even more unsolved questions relating to what you call God's existence. Maybe take a little more time to think things through.......no...

Agnostic is often the name given to an atheist when a theist doesn't understand the argument. With no belief for or against, it's still no belief. Therefore atheist. "EASY!"

Bad analogy. Math is proven.

Your concept of someone with no concept is showing.

Apparently to just point out any of the countless flawed arguments and statements a theists makes is deemed to be divisive or ad hominem.

Your arguments have the tendency of condemning themselves.

lol dude. You’re probably right.... These guys come running up with a really dumb statement then seem to just love being smacked around the head with it. It's almost obscene :D

Oh dear. You need to believe you're not a leprechaun. sheesh. You obviously need to pointlessly bring belief to all things that don't and really shouldn't even have any reason or need for it . "No belief is belief". If that sort of nonsense is what you believe, I'd say belief definately...

Presumably, unless you're so far gone no one’s counting anymore, you have no belief that you are a Leprechaun. "You can believe that (if it gives you comfort) if you want to but its still your 'belief ' ". puleeeze. How come you have to make such silly assertions to defend...

No problem. I don't.

Except that in your superior way, you're obviously not ok with people who don't have a concept , faith or belief of something you call God.

..as each particle of fact just reveals less about the real nature of the whole... No matter how ridiculous the statement ....got to somehow leave that gap for God.