Search results

trendlover is right , again! So there you have an explanation which you asked for , but it will never do no matter how much evidence , will it? You're still wondering why animals selectively bred by humans, and so artificially removed from natural selection are fainting? Do you even...

If you had done a lot of science which taught you to question as you say, then it's a pity you apparently didn't get to question what science actually is. The part of something which can be established by the scientific method is science, that's not what you are calling "science". Not...

What ever world it is ET's anti-science creationists are in, Elvis will be there as well. While being fully immersed themselves in the science which enables the transmitting of data at the speed of light, although of course the scientific wherewithal to do it is based on ONLY a theory, they...

Lol. The only smoking gun is the one you shot yourself in the foot with when you made that post containing your ill-informed hysterical comments. You made mistakes, they've been fully pointed out to you, yet still after months and months you can't come to terms with them. All you can...

You're still lashing out. Is it a form of therapy maybe? Name calling and false claims don't make your wrongs right you know.

ah right, , so you make ridiculous remarks about science theory because you’re prejudiced against those fantastical unproven theories like gravity, radioactivity, evolution. That helps your prejudice for an imaginary creator... how exactly.

You're still getting nowhere lashing out with the same nonsense. What's your point? You make some incorrect non scientific remarks, then shout "science is wrong" , stay angry about it for months ..... for what? Is it to make religion correct to you in some weird way?

Clearly you are still very angry and upset about my response to some clumsy remarks you made quite a while ago. Attacking me, childish name calling, and lashing out at science won't pretend magic your mistakes away.

Oh ok, then all those drive by strawmen red herring pre-conclusions you call questions, is just your prejudice showing through.

For many sadly, willful misunderstanding is religious understanding.

You are wrong .Scientific studies in origins of life (abiogenesis) are based upon established fact. Otherwise it wouldn't be science. You are wrong. Occam's razor is the recommendation, when all the things which are being considered are equal , select one with fewest extra assumptions...

That's only playing with semantics again. In the question of truth, I don't get to build definitions, no one does. Truth is based on fact. A true fact is not a personal one. You just don't get to maintain personal facts above actuality . That's known as belief , or even delusion...

It's really not to do with truth. I think such throwaway generalizations contribute greatly to the distorted views of science Ann Druyan, Carl Sagan's wife refers to, which olias posted. Truth is a fact that has been verified and is provable in conformity to actuality. That is not a...

As origin? Evolution is not about as origin. That's what's wrong with that. It's true. So Eight, do you consider it clever or maybe somehow spiritual to keep yourself ignorant of the facts for evolution?

If what's true is debatable, why are you calling it true in the first place.

It's not my belief, you're misinformed. If you describe science as a worldview of course it's more true than others. It's the scientific method that discovers confirms and establishes fact. You don't want to believe true science? Then fine, be that ridiculous, your prerogative. You are...

But science is not used as such a platform. For one thing science does not deal in pure speculation without verifiable corroboration. That’s what religion’s for. Though theists and religious believers here in this thread would use science as a platform for religion if they could. Using...

What do you think he'd say? The science used to discover, to increase knowledge, is an entirely different thing altogether than any questions of ethics in the possible application of it.

What are you talking about? No one was saying there is a compulsory way of viewing reality. Because the verifiable is coming from the scientific method and from Man as you put it , that makes things no less verifiable. Worldviews suggesting the need for something more than Man merely...