Search results

Well you asked the question and I answered it truthfully, dispassionately and promptly. If you don't like the answer its tough on you, you should have put some escape clause into your wording, some wriggle room, some get-out clause. I say fascists and socialists are the same from the...

If anyone proposes a fascist state I would have to oppose it.

In one sense there is no difference between a socialist party state and a fascist party state - they both ban other parties on ideological grounds. For the oppressed individual within the state, there is no practical difference, so I would support opposition to both.

All this IHT stuff is just a camouflaged class-based attack on the capitalist society. Its not at all likely to lead to greatly increased tax take or improved public services or more free social mobility. Its just another anti fox hunting style recruitment poster for the left.

But is it really "factually accurate" in trading? Who studied traders and trading to get to this conclusion?

Actually, nobody did. It seems highly likely that its a misconstruction of Anders Ericsson's research findings that expert-level performance of the violin required 10,000 hours of practice: he also studied top level athletes and chess grand-masters and gave them the same 10,000 hours to expert...

They take the moral high ground (which they identified) and before you know it, opposing political parties are outlawed as dangerously amoral and there you go, you've got a one-party state like Cuba. In practice, a socialist ruling party has no moral alternative to banning competing political...

My growing fear is they're not joking.

Maybe this is a sign its time to be bullish on stocks.

You're not alone: socialists also like to tell other people how they should spend their money. Not content with exercising their own free will, the philosophy is one of subjugation of other individuals to the perceived common good of the group.

It is up to you, if you have $1 million.

A very good way to win an argument as to what people should do would be to set a good example and show them the benefits. Have you really disinherited your children or are you a liar?

Tougher regulations always help the big players - they will have the resources and it creates a barrier to entry for newer smaller players. They will support if they think they'll get a bigger market share, ironically even if that means a smaller market overall.

Suggestion still stands, give YOUR money to people who morally deserve it more than you do and then you'll be qualified to come back and tell me what's the best thing that should happen to MY money.

The price + 20EMA below 50EMA is not the only exit signal I would take. But it is a fail-safe, a catastrophe stop. Its applicable when other reasons to exit have not printed (or have been ignored). Its applicable to equities which have not printed this signal but it has shown up on their index...

THE market? Which market?

Nobody's going to stop you if you want to give your assets away in life or through your will on your death, based on the moral principles you hold. You don't need a change in the law to accomplish this. Let us know when you've done it.

I don't know what's the point or object of your questioning on this. what you can expect to learn from some random rule that I used to get me out of some positions over a mointh ago - how does that relate to your trading? In fact, on 30/01 I had 6 overlaid long positions on the S&P and 1 on the...

Whatever you like.

I find this signal (price + 20EMA below 50EMA) useful as a fail-safe. Also to cover situations where individual stock charts have not printed a sell but this shows up on the parent index chart. Of course, other stop-loss placement rules might be applied which would lead to an earlier exit...