Search results

can anyone that thinks it's 'wrong' please tell us why? the argument against are PATHETIC! lol. who the hell does it hurt? NO ONE! (not even yourself!)

long shot, get a GRIP dude. "it's life, it's consciousness, it's this, it's that"... ok. i agree. but isn't that doing nothing more than simply stating that YOU value life, that YOU value consciousness? WHY should someone else do so too? is their ANY objective, moral reason someone...

oh yeah.... i'm talking to mr brainiac himself... double down on the market 16 times since june 02 and _I'M_ the crazy one.. .LOL oh man, i should've known you'd turn to 'god'... always the easy way out... obviously you had no answer whatsoever for my question, "what is INSTRINSICALLY...

er, terrorists aren't actually producing or selling a product that is in great demand are they optional?

WHAT? you actually believe that he DONE it? lol

come on guys. time to kiss and make up. the very nature of the discussions that take place in chit chat virtually guarantee that sometimes our emotions are going to get the better of us and that issues become personal and colorful language enters the scene. so someone steps on your toes...

ho boy, hit the nail on the damn head with that one! stil, what do you expect when they free a CONVICTED TERRORIST LEADER (ahmeti) and let him share power in the government! unbelievable! that's what you get when you let those european SCHMUCKS broker a 'peace agreement' (what an almighty...

and the funny thing (well, 'interesting' thing) is that historically, the current market cap as a percentage of gdp is still way high.. actually at the level associated with a market top.. those baby boomers had better gather their forces and start SPENDING soon, or harry dent's gonna...

i would tend to agree with you 'nut. real gdp growth over the last 10 years has been pretty minimal, but they still have pretty full employment and strong savings, so they're still living pretty damn well. (probably a lot better than americans would be if the US went through a similar period)

firstly, i'm not sure which region our national security "is dependant on" at all, let alone "that much". (what i mean, is i don't understand what you were tyring to say) secondly, that region is insignificant? i beg to differ. perhaps you could check out all the literature on the "asian...

would you do that again?

if the only slam on someone is that he's not mj, that's not too bad..

or you could examine the lessons you learnt...

how is al qaeda supposed to wage 'economic warfare'? with what? more terrorism? obviously 9.11 was a wake up call, but terrorism had been occurring for a long time before that. fear and uncertainty are obviously a factor, but barring anything even more devastating than 9.11 (which could, i...

unemployment's about 5%-5.5% i don't have any personal bankruptcy numbers, but they are big savers (very much unlike the credit card zombies in the US) so i'd be surprised if it was very high, or much worse than its historical norms.. (then again, the percentage of self employed in japan...

me either. i'm making it one of my missions in life to get to the bottom of what the hell haz is on about. but, given how much time we takes to post all this stuff, you'd think that he'd begin at the beginning and make some kind of attempt to actually EXPLAIN the fundamentals of his...

i'm still waiting for you to tell me why it's wrong to kill ANYONE? see, if we can make exceptions to 'thou shalt not kill' when it suits our purposes, like war, killing criminals, cattle, pigs etc, why can't we make exceptions when it comes to fetuses? as 'radical' as my point of view...

way to go lundy. that was a brilliant 'argument from outrage' you gave me. now, have a REAL HARD THINK about it, and tell me: what exactly is INTRINSICALLY wrong about kiling? is there ANY other reason we consider it 'wrong', 'evil', 'immoral' apart from the fact that we simply DON'T...

hey scalping, why don't you make your .sig say "i'll take your dime anytime" - it rhymes :)

she's good to get you thinking, and i'll admit to agreeing with her (and other 'freedomites') only because i like their conclusions, not because i find her arguments all that compelling.. she likes to think she's uncovered some natural law of the universe that says if man could be free to do...