Search results

I meant 666. I would never put Tums on ignore. I love the whole SCT crew. They lighten up an otherwise dull day trading.

Well then I'm just going to have to put you on ignore! Your triatribe reminds me of the endless discussions in Reiterative Refinement about how to crayola under conditions when there ARE no volume patterns, haha!

Ah, gotcha, thanks! Monkeys? You should PM with some of them. Very interesting people, for hysterical heretics. What I like about them is that they verifiably TRADE. Badly or well, I don't care. But the company of REAL traders is scarce around here.

Hey, Tums, a polite dis-scent here. WRT this pathetic thread, I wouldn't care how much it got flamed, I'd just put the assholes on ignore (although I have only done that twice in many years that I recall, I prefer to humiliate them with my superiority). And elsewhere I expect others to treat me...

Well, my dear mad monk, nothing is preventing you from posting something intelligent about the ability to codify and hard-code SCT.

Hyperundic peakage And sluggly velocitance? Give the profits back!

Haiku in Dallas Is not haiku in Nippon ET does not care.

I will write haiku Any accurst way I please For it is my thread.

I am finding it increasingly difficult it this atmosphere of rancor to present my case for SCT rationally. But I'll try. After nearly a decade of studlying SCT, I think I can fairly describe myself as a beginner expert. What I find lacking in the currently posted explications of SCT are...

Mo-der-a-ti-on A thank-less E-T task No time left to trade

I'll contribute a modest haiku: Moderation A thankless ET service No time left to trade

Kindly do carry on, JJ. You and 666 got 'em right where you wants 'em! You provide the poedesic insipiration I need to keep coding SCT.

It is with great trepidation that I announce that unoptimized Codified SCT code running on 1-minute netted 57 NQ points today. I will not bother to attach the chart as no one believes me anyway. Now I understand why Jack is so cranky. This is modest progress toward intermediate level...

Roger, we know from yesterday's ephemeral postings that Jack is still with us in spirit. I suggest a polite PM to him requesting provisional novitiate membership in the A-Team. They seem to have misplaced one (Neoxx) and have an immediate opening. If Jack does not reply, PM Todd. If all else...

I neglected to note that with a range of 59 points, 39.88 net points accounts for 68% of the day. One the beginner code is stable I will improve it to intermediate.

Well, I as the Opie I feel all warm and secure that I am protected from accusations of fraud, malice and attention-seeking in my postings. I was especially stung that JJ doubts my proof of the effuckacy of SCT. I had to add 20 SLOCs to the code to handle today's non-PV action. So I came this...

Well, ah cain't say as ah blame 'im! Bin gittin' a mite tard a yore insessunt neg'tivity m'sef. Speshly since ah dune pruved b'yond a shadder 'a dout 'at chickin' fried SCT wurks gud!

I wish to express my profoundest appreciation to 666 for providing us links to recordings of Jack speaking. It all makes so much more sense now when I go back and reread old posts in his voice. And I have perfected the illusion of Jack calling out SCT annutations in my head. Also, I have another...

The eighth refined iteration of Codified SCT. Almost 40 NQ points net. Actual results may vary depending on your ability to distinguish green from red.

You should look at both. Stretches your brain.