Search results

Nope. Just Wilson. And who says he "leaned into a police car"? Who says he went for the gun?

What is your distinction between "running away" and "fleeing"?

Who says he attempted to murder a police officer?

Who says I have you on Ignore? I just don't bother to read your posts since they are nothing but drive-by snark. The boot print business is only in your imagination.

And what does the US Supreme Court have to say about firing at a fleeing suspect?

And which might be the "good"?

Then perhaps those "quality" posts won't be missed . . .

Have fun sorting it out:

Speaking of fucking moron (with a short-term memory deficiency), here is what you said: "Six supposed witnesses said in the article that Brown was shot at from behind. Hmm, why did the multiple autopsies state all bullets entered him from the front? I suppose this could explain why certain...

Quality posts on Benghazi and impeachment? On Obama's being a Kenyan Muslim terrorist who wants to destroy America? On Michelle Obama's resembling a gorilla? Nonsense about CO2 emissions cooling the planet? Those quality posts?

Which is pertinent how?

Which has zip to do with my comment that you don't know the difference between "shot" and "shot at". Wanna try again? Maybe you can get it right this time.

I sure hope so :)

No, he's warning that he'll "veto any spending bill that prohibits federal funds from being spent to enact [his] executive amnesty." Why do you people do this?

Like rewriting the Constitution?

Your "factual" post of witnesses' testimony? If it's "factual", why do they not all agree? Do you not have any idea what a "fact" is?

I don't suppose his unarmed stepson having been gunned down by a police officer might have anything to do with it.

I guess Dickhead doesn't have me on Ignore after all. ;)

"a fun place for smart economic and political conversations" ;)

Seems Dickhead can't make a distinction between "shot" and "shot at". This does not surprise me. Too much time spent at "examiner.com".