Search results

Yes. The only problem is that Brown did not commit a crime involving the infliction of serious physical harm.

You're probably right. I forgot about jem's tendency toward OCD (this may account for the obsession with douching). As for 37, who knows?

Admit what? I never said that Brown was shot in the back. As to the ME, all one has to do is look it up. And you may want to examine that diarrhea fixation you have.

Depends on what scenario one follows according to his prejudgements. As to the bruised and swollen face, odd that it never changed color.

Not necessarily. The ME was unable to determine whether the injury to the arm was caused by being shot from the front or the back. However, it is consistent with testimony and with events that since Wilson was firing at Brown as he fled (something that wetodd can't get), a shot that hit from in...

Since you continue to be confused about all of this, I suggest you read the SCOTUS decision itself.

And the SCOTUS says what about firing at someone who is fleeing?

AGW Denier

And was the GJ there to see whether or not Brown attempted to "murder" Wilson? Again, who other than Wilson says that Brown tried to "murder" him? (The guys back at the station and those who heard about it over the grapevine don't count.)

Proximity to the car in and of itself is not particularly relevant. What is relevant is that he was chasing him. He would not have to chase him unless he was fleeing. This is really difficult for you, isn't it?

Actually, regarding the "murder" attempt, the presumption is on your part.

I'm not inferring anything. I'm suggesting yet again that those who want to know the law in this regard rather than spew unfounded opinions do a little googling re the SCOTUS decision. If you don't want to do that, then don't.

That's the distance he chased him down, putz. How could he "fear for his safety" if he was chasing him?

You have yet to answer the question, but we'll come back to it when the trial takes place.

Hardly a non sequitur. Again, who says that Brown tried to "murder" Wilson independent of Wilson's testimony? As to the lawful part, I suggest, again, that you review the SCOTUS ruling on this.

Are you serious? What is the difference between "toward" and "away"? Where the hell did you go to school?

I'm sure Breitbart et al have comment sections. But jem wouldn't get nearly so much attention.

And how, since they weren't there, would they know? Who?

As to Johnson, the ME's results show that all of the wounds were in the front, with the possible exception of a wound to one arm which may have come from the back. This may be what Johnson is referring to. As to Al Sharpton, well . . .

What's so misleading? He chased him for the distance you show then gunned him down. Thanks for the visual.