Search results

Knock yourself out. Please. If all these sci orgs say it's from man do really "think" the climatologists would have a different opinion? Good thing you fly jets and don't have to use your brain much. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

American Association for the Advancement of Science "The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3 American Chemical Society "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and...

Thanks for providing yet another example of just how fucking stupid deniers are. From the article cited.. "other teams have variously produced dates for an open summer ocean that, broadly speaking, go out from about 2040 to 2100." So of course the retarded denier morons focus on what one guy...

That is correct. There was no prediction the Arctic would be ice free by 2013. Certainly not by the consensus opinion of IPCC as I show in the chart above.

Yes, the ice melt predictions were wrong.

Depends how one defines fact, but basically yes. Very good, you are learning. Didn't think it possible.

Just like Sarah would say.

Jason Becker, a self-identified independent and stay-at-home father in Ocoee, Fla., said that although climate change was not his top concern, a candidate who questioned global warming would seem out of touch. “I don’t think it’s the number one hot issue in the world,” Mr. Becker said. “There...

WASHINGTON — An overwhelming majority of the American public, including nearly half of Republicans, support government action to curbglobal warming, according to a poll conducted by The New York Times,Stanford University and the nonpartisan environmental research group Resources for the Future...

They also misspelled Fox. It's Faux.

The "trick" is actually a technique (in other words, a "trick of the trade") used in a peer-reviewed, academic science journal article published in 1998. "Hiding the decline," another phrase that has received much attention, refers to another technique used in another academic science journal...

Climategate. Eight committees investigated the allegations and published reports, finding no evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct.[15] The scientific consensus that global warming is occurring as a result of human activity remained unchanged by the end of the investigations.[17] However...

Shut up idiot. I'm so tired of your bullshit. You are just a fucking asshole.

Imagine someone more shifty and deceptive and stubbornly stupid as jerm.

Imagine if you ever knew CO2 is a ghg.

Oh now I found better look at the albedo thing. http://www.skepticalscience.com/earth-albedo-effect.htm

Some interesting data discussed here showing that over time the reflected wavelengths of the GHGs has increased over the last several decades. http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect.htm As far as albedo, the decreasing and dirtier expanses of ice...

And this disproves AGW how? Idiot?

No, they did not idiot.

I know. And actually looking further than one sentence sound bites taken out of context is beyond the ability of deniers. That would require some mental effort and facing the fact that they have been deluded by right wing propaganda.