Search results

"It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is coming from anthropogenic sources." Are you really this stupid? No. You are just a fucking liar. How does it feel to contribute to deaths and...

This problem requires the govt. The solution starts with voting for politicians that understand and accept the science and that will then vote for solutions. Those solutions include a slowly increasing CO2 tax, mandating efficiency increases and encouragement of a rapid move to nuclear power...

More vacuous horseshit. No I'm bothered by this completely ridiculous statement...one that a paid-for-whore working at a conservative think tank would make . Carbon dioxide concentration appears to be mostly driven by temperature rather than man's emissions, and the rise in CO2 concentration...

Oh, no doubt. Extreme sells. The real story is too boring to report.

No YOU don't know, or more accurately pretend you don't know. You're a fucking liar and insane to boot. A carbon tax does not mean a totalitarian govt. That's just the raving of a lunatic.

By their percentage contribution to the greenhouse effect on Earth the four major gases are:[21][22] water vapor, 36–70% carbon dioxide, 9–26% methane, 4–9% ozone, 3–7% The major non-gas contributor to the Earth's greenhouse effect, clouds, also absorb and emit infrared radiation and thus...

If one googles "the hansen hypothesis" the only relevant hit is way down the page and is from LOL WUWT. https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&rlz=1C1KMZB_enUS574US574&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=the+hansen+hypothesis&start=0 If piehole has a link to this purported "hypothesis"-...

Unfortunately, as in many of these movements that have good intent, there is a whacko faction that seem to get all the attention. Especially by the right wing media. On Sunday there 40,000 people marching for action on climate change but the few hundred radicals on Monday got more attention.

I don't agree with her. They are separate issues and trying to tie one to the other can only hurt the cause of reducing CO2 by alienating folks. Many corporations are making moves to reduce their carbon footprint. The last thing that the clean energy movement needs is to be associated with...

There is certainly a cost that is not included now. Some cost must be included. We can do that with a slowly ramping tax on carbon. The Earth’s changing climate is costing the global economy $1.2 trillion a year and killing 1,000 children a day, according to a new study—and the U.N. warns...

. Related story: Google cuts ties with conservative group over climate-change stance the Sierra Club and major unions, including the Service Employees International Union and the AFL-CIO, joined 50 other groups this month in demanding that Google end its membership in the American...

And many of them think they are Christians. Libertarianism is a step backward to a more savage past.

An interview with James Hansen. Hero. Catastrophic climate change can be averted, Hansen says, but only if we start “putting an honest price on the fossil fuels that includes their environmental costs, both their effect on human health, those costs being paid completely by the public, their...

Pretty sure the Koch bros want a slowly escalating carbon tax even though of course that would be pure socialism and would turn the US into a completely socialist state. With zombies and illegal aliens. They also know that for now we need to leave much of the fossil fuels in the ground. And...

No, this is a lie. The hockey stick has been proven up down and sideways. You are lying and posting irrelevant bullshit again. You are one fucked-up dude. [quo te="jem, post: 4021001, member: 8212"]

Dick now works for the CATO Institute. They pay better than the IPCC. The Cato Institute is an American libertarianthink tank headquartered in Washington, D.C. It was founded as the Charles Koch Foundation in 1974 by Ed Crane, Murray Rothbard, and Charles Koch,[6] chairman of the board and...

The April 30, 2012 New York Times article included the comments of several other experts. Christopher S. Bretherton, an atmospheric researcher at the University of Washington, said Lindzen is "feeding upon an audience that wants to hear a certain message, and wants to hear it put forth by people...

These guys are real scientists, as opposed to what piehole is. The Geological Society of America "The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate...

I'm wondering pie. How can a 40% rise in the earth's most important greenhouse gas NOT cause temps to rise? Is there some kind of cooling going on to offset it? Why am I asking you? You are not a climate scientist and are obviously being paid by a think tank to spread lies.