Search results

There something rather then nothing because that is simply how it is. There need not be any other reason.

And yet no reputable climate scientist denies it and every one of them agrees AGW is real. Along with the Weather Channel and Exxon. Come on jerm, come up with ONE climate scientist. Or just go away and shut the fuck up already.

No and no. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

Filling Up the Republican Tank Dr. Michael Mann, Professor of Meteorology at Penn State University, is not coy in his sentiments for the Republican agenda, nor in discussing where they take it from. Dr. Mann has been on the forefront of the climate change debate for as long as the idea of a...

Here are some informative links for you. At the heart of it, man made global warming is pretty simple. CO2 is an important greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gasses keep the earth warm. We have raised levels of CO2 by 40% over the last 150 years. This has caused an increase in the greenhouse...

The problem is not with Hansen. It is with you. You are simple too stupid to understand the science and what was said and you are deluded because you get all your information from right wing propaganda sources. You are just too stupid and deluded.

Why don't you tell us why you never post anything of value and are a douchebag? You're defending the adult diaper wearing duh-commisewer? Figures, two douchbags in a pod.

Yes, the problem is all the record levels of ice around the world. There is just too much of it. What will we do with all the ice? Oh no....the ice.

BTW jerm, you never came up with even ONE climatologist that denies man made global warming did you? Come on jerm, there must be ONE reputable climatologist. A 2010 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (PNAS) reviewed publication and citation data...

Jem how stupid do you have to be to not be convinced that the rising CO2 levels are from man. How stupid jerm? And you expect us to take you seriously? You are the laughing stock of ET. And that's saying something.

So?

Looks like they are right to me. Please try to make sense.

Fox news science? lol Oxymoron. Accent on the moron...

So what? They are Faux News watching moron right wing nut jobs.

sigh....

Global warming is already having significant and costly effects on our communities, our health, and our climate. Unless we take immediate action to reduce global warming emissions, these impacts will continue to intensify, grow ever more costly and damaging, and increasingly affect the entire...

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature OPEN ACCESS John Cook1,2,3, Dana Nuccitelli2,4, Sarah A Green5, Mark Richardson6, B?rbel Winkler2, Rob Painting2, Robert Way7, Peter Jacobs8 and Andrew Skuce2,9...

Forbes is peer reviewed? lol Why don't you get it straight from the Cato Institute? lol "...over 12,000 peer-reviewed abstracts on the subjects of 'global warming' and 'global climate change' published between 1991 and 2011 found that of the papers taking a position on the cause of...

But there is an essentially complete consensus among the experts. Really. NO reputable climatologist denies it nor ANY major science org. Yes are one or two paid for whores of the FF ind and a few just plain fools. But they are not reputable...

Still waiting for you to show us one paper from one reputable climate scientist that refutes AGW. The consensus is actually higher than 97% among the experts.