Search results

Yeah, that is great news. I'm sure that the GOP candidates now realize how wrong they were and will now embrace science and the war on climate change. They will realize that inaction is immoral.

What percent of health care costs could be eliminated by taking out the health insurance companies and with centralizing record keeping, prescription paperwork etc. A large part of health care costs is just due to the absurd paperwork. This could be streamlined under single payer.

The QQQs are at 100 I have limit buys at 91 81 and 71. Had a little cash waiting for this.

Oh look^ the liar is posting.

Some of the earth's previous extinction events occurred due to temp changes far more gradual than today's Anthropocene extinction event. ********************** The Permian–Triassic (P–Tr) extinction event, colloquially known as the Great Dying or the Great Permian Extinction,[2][3] occurred...

But Al Gore is a big fat bore. What does your so-called science say about that?

So the future of the planet depends on Russel Crowe. We're screwed.

Goodbye old growth forests. Goodbye marshes and beaches. Goodbye 30% of the planet's species. The coral reefs, bye bye. It's depressing.

At the rate we are going it is not a question of if, it's when. Imagine what the coastal cities will be like.

Since 1990 the oceans have have absorbed around 2 X 10^23 J of energy. Hiroshima atom bomb released around 6.3 X10^13 J, meaning that 3.2 X10^9 bombs need to be dropped since 1990 to equal the same energy as absorbed by the sun. 3.2X10^9 / 788400000 (time passed since 1990 in sec) = 4 ; aka 4...

Jem, I'm putting you ignore. I have no desire to deal with a psychotic liar that eagerly and knowingly peddles denier lies and has zero interest in the actual truth. In short, go fuck yourself you goddamned liar, again.

So that's what you believe even after seeing these charts. You're full of shit. Troll. Or you are incredibly stupid. I go with the former. and this and this

....for the last 75 years is equivalent to the heat absorbed by the oceans from man made global warming. "These finding have potentially serious consequences for life in the oceans as well as for patterns of ocean circulation, storm tracks and storm intensity," said Oregon State University...

So you can't even acknowledge that the sudden rise in CO2 is due to man yet you want some proof of AGW. Is that right? Answer the question troll....yes or no.

MY side? You mean the science? lol So you can't even acknowledge that the sudden rise in CO2 is due to man yet you want some proof of AGW. Is that right?

Duh. Do you EVER say anything intelligent?

Wow jem, you should write peer reviewed article about how their CO2 measurements are wrong. I am sure they would to see what a crazed Lintardarian has to say about science denial. So let's be clear about just how insane/stupid and or a liar you are. You think that the sudden rise in CO2 is not...

So what? You STILL don't know the difference between the deep abyss and the waters above 5000 meters? Of course you do. You just want to lie. You're just another pos denier liar. Do you always lie this much? Are you a lawyer also? Or maybe just a good right wing sheep.

So according to you, this sudden rise of CO2 in the last two hundred years is due to a rise in ocean temps. Is that right? Is that what you think the science is saying?