Search results

To answer the OP.....yes, but not Bernie. At least someone with that name. I mean who would want a Bernie for president. People name their dogs Bernie.

So this is the "debate" that TooOld puts forth as an example of "skeptics winning" I quote from the article... the debate was a bit "stacked" given that it was sponsored by theScience and Public Policy Institute, an organization whose mission statement includes the following: The Institute...

You must be joking. ha ha, good one. Wait, you ARE joking right?

The problem is that as these no carbon energy sources become more viable and used more, the price of fossil fuels decreases making it hard for them to compete. There needs to be a slowly ramping carbon tax - that can returned to the taxpayers. As it is now, the true cost of their use is not...

You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. All the data in the hockey stick chart is available, has been looked at by a famous skeptic - Richard Muller - and confirmed. You are perhaps the only one on this forum as stupid and deluded as wildchild

Here is the debate. How much further up will this go along with the temps before we act?

Nice who's who of frauds and fools. Again I ask. Are you for real? Do you work for an interested party? This is complete and total horsehit. You are either a moron or a liar. Or both.

But piezoe, we have gone through this already. Deep ocean is not the same as the ocean. The following chart shows the ocean that is not considered deep ocean. The error bars are not large because of the small temp change since it is not temperature alone that determines heat content. Nice...

It has certain simple sound to it which should appeal to the simple righties. I think he should go with "Jeb! Is he really Hispanic like he wrote on his voter form? Or really just a bumbling fool? Vote for him and find out!"

Obama has been a very good president and Hillary will be even better.

They already share all their research. There is no reason for them not to. They want to get the science out and in the public eye. The climate scientists are frustrated with the gulf between what they know and what the public thinks they know. This is not like research into the genome or...

I am feeling a bit peckish.

True. They look tasty.

You are so incredibly stupid that it's actually physically painful read your stupid shit.

And the WSJ and Fox News and the GOP and their fossil fuel industry puppet masters don't? Just what kind of moron are you? The oil companies have profits larger than most country's GDP. You do know what GDP is right? And if you think that NASA and NOAA are fraudulently doing the science to...

The NASA website has been debunked? WTF are you babbling about? The 97% certainly has NOT been debunked. In fact, it's closer to 100%. Among all the world's publishing climatologists there is one that denies man made global warming. One. And he works for Russian oil. Virtually every major...

Fuck the polar bears. Who needs them.

Your last several posts have just been brilliant.

In fact, considering that the fossil fuel industry has so much say in our government, it's amazing that NOAA and NASA are allowed to get real science out. Bush tried to but..

Who? You keep coming up with these imagined people when in fact the oil industry truly does control our government.