Search results

  1. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    OK then.....NOAA. Get your climate science from them. You wanna go with their Republican boat captains. THEY know the deal.
  2. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Ricter, you have go with the Republican NASA food service workers for the science of climate change. Get with the program.
  3. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    You forgot about the janitors and the Republican NASA food service workers. lol
  4. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    The study is probably wrong. The bulk of the evidence and the best satellite data shows that the ice mass is decreasing. It contradicts numerous prior scientific claims, including a 2012 study in Science by a small army of polar scientists, a study from earlier this year in Earth and...
  5. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Yes Ric, there a bunch of Republican astronauts and janitors that are very mad at NASA.
  6. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Yes, Ricter, don't you know? NASA is not reliable. Bunch of space cadets. For the real science of "globull warming" you need to go with the petroleum geologists.
  7. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Yes I continue to maintain that the consensus is at least 97% and the debate over the basics is over and has been for quite some time. I maintain that because it's the truth and any reasonable look at the issue shows I'm correct. One has to really try hard to lie about. Why do you try so hard...
  8. F

    "The Donald" as Pro Wrestler

    "You can tell us why pro wrestling fans who vote for Trump are stupid" Yes. It is true.
  9. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Nope, no scientific paper. Volcanoes. Must be because there is no scientific paper proving that greenhouses hold in solar radiation. That was an interesting video. Talk about low impact/carbon footprint.
  10. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Ric, it's just as likely that volcanoes under the house are doing the heating. There's no science showing greenhouses hold in heat. Just show me ONE science paper proving it. Oh, I forgot............troll. ;)
  11. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Yeah, I sort of feel sorry him. He's backed himself into a corner and the only way out is a huge blow to his ego. Oh well. I suspect this is the problem with most of the deniers. Cognitive dissonance.
  12. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    So then you disagree with Judith Curry. And virtually every climate scientist on the planet. Why are we even arguing with you? It's like arguing with the crazy shopping cart lady.
  13. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Holy crap you are confused .......this is the second time I have posted this. You just don't learn do you? It's like your brain can't process info that conflicts with your delusions. When she was questioned about potential conflicts of interest, this was her response to the Scientific...
  14. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Yup she gets paid by fossil fuel interests. She said so herself. She's a dumb attention whore.
  15. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Too bad no credible climate expert agrees with you and they all say you are wrong. And bottom line, she believes in AGW. Doofus.
  16. F

    So much for those tough gun control laws

    make them illegal
  17. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    One more time. Not that what the dumb attention whore says really matters.. she says human activities are contributing to global warming, but she bridles at the IPCC consensus that humans are "largely responsible" — in other words, that more than 50 percent of global warming to date is caused...
  18. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Yes I have you idiot. She believes in AGW. No question. You are very ignorant and delusional and brainwashed by RW propaganda. Try reading stuff from real sources.
  19. F

    So much for those tough gun control laws

    Sure they are, killing with guns is the easiest way to do it. It's what they are designed to do. If they don't have the handgun because they are banned they will have a harder time killing. Idiot.
Back
Top