Search results

Even after "watermellon" is included?

And if this were a gay thread this would point to a supply/demand imbalance.

Or the hottie of a cousin a bad name, but a great recommendation?

I saw it but did not take it because: The MA was horizontal at the pivot bar Market didn't have much momentum for last couple of hours Only 2 handles to the days low, and the low might hold

I didn't take it either because the moving average was flat at the initial pivot point at 9:55. Otherwise the method said to go short at 1005. Too bad I didn't.:mad:

Bull$hiite- You little girl, we were learning something until you went crying to the Moderators that JR was hurting your little girly feelings by posting rudeness about you.

*NO* you may not. However you may point out that Walter *is* an ass.

And that's not a long drive.

LOL Now that children, in the world of politics, is what is known as a: "Non-denial denial"

Gee.. you figger that might include? WALTER A N K E R

Dear Moderator- Please cut JR some slack. His posts and this thread have been genuinely helpful to me and to others. I would like them to continue, unhindered by too tight a rein.

I don't think that met the rules: It had not traded down to a lower low of the pivot bar. That bar's low was 1011.25 at 2:50 PP EDT The next bar after the 2:50 PM bar made an equal high, which JR had said was a bad sign, not so good as a single spike.

I see the difference, he is using EMA and I am using SMA. Therefore his line is more influenced by more recent bars.

Your moving average line does not look as smooth as mine. Mine continues down without such an abrupt jump up. Perhaps you should check that your moving average is really a 10 period moving average? I did not take the trade because of the big pullback, though yesterday had winning trades that...

I don't know whether in the final talley you will learn nothing here, or if it "is for ego reasons only." Even if those two statements were true that doesn't mean that the keeping and publishing of a journal might not be of benefit to the poster. I cannot speak for you, but I know that if...

NT's main page, upper right corner, has three boxes, OT, AT, SS. Do you have any of these boxes checked? Thank you.

I would greatly appreciate that. Especially am I interested in your settings of "the ratio trigger."

These might be what you want. They are on page 1: "PROFIT OBJECTIVE: DAX: 15 points is 375 Euros (one point is 25 Euros, one tick is half a point i.e. 12.50) ESTX50: 10-15 points is 100-150 Euros (one point is 10 Euros, one tick is one point). This target be too little and is...

Johnny's little brother, Simtrader, heard of your complaint and engaged the services of one of the leading authorities on such matters to evaluate your complaint and to give a report on those who would disrupt threads. He has just issued his oral findings on such people...

I understand the preference for the non native stop-limit order in the DAX where slippage is expected and a different price is used for the stop and the limit. But for the ESTX50 your rule is the "same as DAX except the initial stop-limit order should have the same limit price as stop price."...