Search results

Again with dividends, continuing to argue by giving a single case and ignoring the big picture as a whole. How many companies are able to pay dividends compare to how many that aren't? How many companies will be able to survive long enough to cover the other thousand money-losing companies?

You might PM to steve46, he may be able to give you some idea and preparation.

Welcome to Wall Street!

Very useful to know that. This kind of comment that every ET member like to hear about. One of the good reasons to join ET.

You mean the SEC price? Ask Martha Stewart.

I never doubt about women ability to succeed in this business. I always respect them and their skill. One woman mentioned in the Market Wizard is very talented. We're just arguing about the war.

Yes, they can see our stop, once our account is completely evaporated. Then we stop.

You never understand the main reason for the war, remember people and land are invaluable, money is nothing for the state leader.

It doesn't matter who funded, the fact is the war exist more than 2000 years ago, not with the reason of money but with the main reasons that I stated above. You mentioned that it's unnecessary war here, probably unnecessary for now but maybe crucial for hundred and thousand years later. You...

I may agree with you for our modern time, the point is the war has been existing many many years ago well before the existence of those bankers. The reason for going to war because we want to protect our people, land, water, power, integrity etc. The same as in financial market, we want to win...

Not necessary greed but excitement, challenge, feel the win and defeat. That's why men go to war and only kill the strong ones, but not women and childrens.

Sure. $1 million in debt if my broker is stupid enough to allow me continue to trade a full year.

She means not greedy for the money but greedy for something else.

You guys, you always give case by case to support your non zero-sum concept. If it has infinite cases, you will get n right cases divide by infinite that's will result a zero point. Let see the big picture, the money in and the money out. The money in are IPO, additional raises, our...

0.1% is not a tenth, it's a thousandth since 0.1/100 = 0.001. Remember % sign equal a division by 100, meaning that 10% = 0.10 So, a $100M is not likely to be realised since we have the wrong calculation from the start. I already told the author, the guy who start this thread, to reduce...

Taking about dividends, the unique valid argument that can support a non zero-sum. Unfortunately, there're very few companies that can pay dividends, most of them are in S&P500, compare to thousand other companies, probably 10000, that can't return money to their investors. Where are those...

Because they have their moneys there too.

Nicolas Darvas at the beginning he thought it's about ecomony, serious business, wealth creation; and he lost. Until he started to find out the truth; it's just The Other Las Vegas then he started to make money.

Both sides have valid arguments to approve or disapprove. The fact, that one believe it's a zero-sum game make him to think, to be aware, that this is a very risky business. Then he must have an edge in order to survive. In contrast, one who believe it's not a zero-sum game make him to think...

We are very glad to see that the Observations on the NYSE specialist has been resolved. Now we move to another subject which is the Observations on the NYSE Rules. :) I'm learning from you guys.