Recent content by jsfsn

  1. J

    Technical Analysis = CRAP

    Seems like he removed the discretionary part of TA...
  2. J

    Technical Analysis = CRAP

    I'll bump this. Two of many papers that show that TA works. Keep in mind that the researchers probably has less skill than a lot of traders.
  3. J

    Technical Analysis = CRAP

    That sound a bit lik a martingale system, which I believe everyone here agrees is doomed to fail...
  4. J

    Technical Analysis = CRAP

    @marketsurfer I'v posted twice in this thread hoping you would address some of the arguments I brought up (if one can call them that...). Here are two papers that I would like you to comment on: http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2011/2011-001.pdf...
  5. J

    Technical Analysis = CRAP

    This is my belief. I think that as the actors get more and more effective, exploiting other actors will be harder and harder to the point where the profit is less than the spread/commission. I do not believe in the EMH.
  6. J

    Technical Analysis = CRAP

    I'm a bit suprised no academic papers has been brought up. There are some for and some against TA. the most notable paper I read proved (through backtesting, however) that TA/PA worked well but has been declining the last couple of years. I'm convinced TA has worked to some extent, but they...
  7. J

    Technical Analysis = CRAP

    I'm a bit suprised no academic papers has been brought up. There are some for and some against TA. the most notable paper I read proved (through backtesting, however) that TA/PA worked well but has been declining the last couple of years. I'm convinced TA has worked to some extent, but they...
  8. J

    Technical Analysis = CRAP

    @marketsurfer I have read most of this thread but admittedly not everything. I also read an older thread that was started back in 2007 which brought up the same thing. Do you believe that TA work at all? There was a recent paper published which claimed that the market paid attention to...
Back
Top