Look, my post was deleted because it looked detrimental to your sponsor. I'm not an idiot, and I'm not 19. I understand your censoring policy. Most message boards have similar rules of conduct. But BLAH? Gimme a break.
Blah really needed to be censored? How about WilliamRennick? No censoring some of his remarks. I particularly like his post a couple weeks ago
I left this site back in 2002, after just a handful of posts, because of the extremely rude things many members said to new traders. Market sentiment at the time was at its lowest point since the bubble burst, and letting members rant and vent frustrations at that time was probably acceptable collateral. But censoring a complaint about identical posts, and a "I second that" remark?...
This is stupid.
All I did was second another member's remark about that particular post being EXACTLY THE SAME ONE THAT WAS ALREADY IN ANOTHER THREAD.Your post got deleted because it was stupid and added zero to the thread.
Blah really needed to be censored? How about WilliamRennick? No censoring some of his remarks. I particularly like his post a couple weeks ago
This post really needed to be moved to "feedback"? I wonder why it's not in the main forum? Hmmm...quote from Willy:
.
I left this site back in 2002, after just a handful of posts, because of the extremely rude things many members said to new traders. Market sentiment at the time was at its lowest point since the bubble burst, and letting members rant and vent frustrations at that time was probably acceptable collateral. But censoring a complaint about identical posts, and a "I second that" remark?...
This is stupid.

) That type of thing is not going to provide new members confidence in the legitimacy of ET.