Quote from jack hershey:
Wow.. just wait until you get to the behavioural part.
There is a fast track alternative to your experience.
The people who are or will be responding with the no answer, probably went the alternative route.
The subconscious is the larger part of the learning process and there are many proofs documented on this nowadays.
Since this is the case, it may be capitalized upon to fast track being very successful in a very short time.
One of the most profound examples is a guy in Vegas. One of the side effects of his trip is how he talks when he is looking at chats of the market either real time or canned.
About every 5 to 10 minutes he stops and takes a breath. He has just realized that he is talking at a pace that is extremely rapid and would defy an ordinary person understanding him. His lead programmer (Nick) is used to this in work sessions, and he "gets it" even though there is a significant filter in the space.
for this guy to be able to bring what is ordinarily unconscious into the space, the guy says it is like he is first hearing the words at the same time they become audible. He is very aware of this an his facial expression is much like that of an intent listener as he actually is the speaker.
Another by product of this level of operating is where you choose to narrate relative to the present. Once you are working with some other talented person(s), it is a very good idea to peg your narrative to a leading spot that gives the person time to steer himself to the pertinent part of the upcoming display. Then both of you can zoom into the detailed signals that are coming up.
The surfer/Spyder exchange is a good example in part. It was a remote (not in same room) connection that might have flown very well. The necessity to be on the same page, at least, wasn't met, however.
Wait, let me get it straight.... you are assuming that great minds think alike even though they are not interacting with each other??
