Vista for $611 a joke? Try $713!

Quote from pcgeek86:

Yeah, well, the only reason I'd go with BSD at all is because of the recently improved compatibility with Java. I installed Java on FreeBSD a year or so ago, and it was an absolute bitch. In fact, come to think of it, I don't think I ever got it working. Haha ...

I'm sure that if I did set up a Linux workstation, I would use something like Fedora Core or Ubuntu though. Have you tried the free version of Solaris x86? I grabbed all the ISOs at one point, but never installed it ... hmmm

I have installed Solaris 8 on PCs a few years ago, but not recently. I've done quite a lot of sofware development on Solaris. It is an excellent OS and Solaris 10 has some unique desirable features, but if installing on a PC I'd check hardware compatabilitly - especially graphics cards. Possibly Nvidia would be a good choice.
 
Quote from dcraig:

Possibly Nvidia would be a good choice.
:D That's pretty much all I use ... driver compatibility has always been top-of-the-line, although a lot of ATi fanbois would love to disagree. :p
 
I think Vista is more resource hogging, meaning you meed more horse poower to run. Unless there is a stable 64 bit trading software, I wouldn't upgrade to Vista because I want to my software to run as efficiently as possible. Upgrading to Vista might slow you down in 32 bit with your current hardware.

I would run a 64 bit version of Vista if I could, with the latest Core Duo 2 CPU and at least 4GB of RAM for many other things.

Ideally, running Linux for trading is best if you don't need anything other things besides your trading platform.
 
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate FULL VERSION [DVD] (Windows XP)
newest version
Buy new: $379.99
Where is "713" in that? Or is there some version higher than Ultimate I am not aware of?

Microsoft Windows Vista Magically Ultimate Edition?
 
Quote from pcgeek86:

Where is "713" in that? Or is there some version higher than Ultimate I am not aware of?

Microsoft Windows Vista Magically Ultimate Edition?

Sift through the thread... you'll find it.
 
Quote from gnome:

Sift through the thread... you'll find it.
Oh, it's their fault for believing the Inquirer then ... I thought they had a legitimate source .. my bad
 
Quote from pcgeek86:

Where is "713" in that? Or is there some version higher than Ultimate I am not aware of?

Microsoft Windows Vista Magically Ultimate Edition?

Ultimate is the top-of-the-line edition. I don't think many need it however, Vista Home Premium is equal to XP Pro so it will be the mainstream version.

The $713 comes form a linux fanboy who doesn't believe in currency conversion. Its in British Pounds not USD. As I said before, inaccurate title.

Since the majority of users on E.T. use USD, it would have been thoughtful for the author to do some simple currency conversions.

It should read: "Vista for $611 Pounds a joke? Try $713 Pounds!"

or more accurate:

"Vista for $221 USD a joke? Try $259 USD!"

But then no one would read the thread since those prices are in-line with expectations. Thus the inaccurate title reference.
 
@crazy: fanboys are unnecessarily pushy. :\

And yeah, I might just end up getting Business Edition for my laptop since the graphics processor isn't that great. I'll have to weigh Ultimate to it, but I really don't think I'll need it. Thanks for the insight.
 
Back
Top