The Religion of Peace - humping every ten year old in sight

Curious how controversial it is that a culture openly admits to sex with toddlers. You'd think that would suffer universal outrage. That the liberals (supposed defenders of feminism) would be leading the charge for change.

Interesting that the left are so supportive of this outrage. Not surprising though. All these surface issues like womens rights are just cover. These losers are only interested in power.
 
Quote from TGregg:

Curious how controversial it is that a culture openly admits to sex with toddlers. You'd think that would suffer universal outrage. That the liberals (supposed defenders of feminism) would be leading the charge for change.

Interesting that the left are so supportive of this outrage. Not surprising though. All these surface issues like womens rights are just cover. These losers are only interested in power.

What would you do to effectively convince hardline Muslims to abandon this law, TGregg? Let's disscuss in a constructive way.
 
Quote from TGregg:

Curious how controversial it is that a culture openly admits to sex with toddlers. You'd think that would suffer universal outrage. That the liberals (supposed defenders of feminism) would be leading the charge for change.

Interesting that the left are so supportive of this outrage. Not surprising though. All these surface issues like womens rights are just cover. These losers are only interested in power.

Jewish Faith?

The Tannaïtic Midrash Sifre to Numbers in §157 comments on the above quoted commandment of MOSES to kill the Midianite women as well as the male children...."

"....According to the Tannaïte Rabbis, MOSES therefore had ordered the Israelites to kill all women older than three years and a day, because they were "suitable for having sexual relations." [138]...."

"Said Rabbi Joseph, "Come and take note: A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse....."

"A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse. "A girl three years old may be betrothed through an act of sexual intercourse," the words of R. Meir. And sages say, "Three years and one day old."....."

[37A] Since he is then suitable for having sexual relations, he also is deemed unclean with the flux uncleanness [of Lev.15]."
Said Rabina, "Therefore a gentile girl who is three years and one day old, since she is then suitable to have sexual relations, also imparts uncleanness of the flux variety."
That is self-evident!
Abodah Zarah 36B-37A [133]


Regards,

Sameeh
 
Quote from Tresor:

This is a racist statement. You should cease to be the moderator.
What the hell are you talking about? He's referring to a religious group, not a race of people. Try sobering up before you post next time.

The facts are always inconvenient for people like you, defenders of these maniacs. There are a few other people on here who defend them, with arguments like 'child rape is a part of their culture and must be respected'. I will not name any names because I have been told that if I do, I will be banned permanently.
 
Quote from Tresor:

What would you do to effectively convince hardline Muslims to abandon this law, TGregg? Let's disscuss in a constructive way.

If he could reform Muslims, who would he hate next? There has to be someone, apparently.
 
Quote from traderNik:

I will not name any names because I have been told that if I do, I will be banned permanently.

Another conspiracy theorist...:confused:
 
Quote from Ricter:

If he could reform Muslims, who would he hate next? There has to be someone, apparently.

Yes, it seems that for TGregg there must be an image of an outside enemy (them) that keeps him alive.
 
Momo,

I don't believe this. For sure the moderators share the simple and easy to understand ethics that a child rape cannot be justified or defended.

Similarily your nation which kills thousand of innocent civilians in Gaza cannot be justified or defended for the attrocities commited.

Regards
 
Quote from Mom0/pH0x:

nope, no conspiracy theory at all... he was advised by the moderator that if he mentions the FACT THAT OPTOINAL777, then known as ZZZzzzzzzz defended child rape and pedophilia in muslim society because it was a cultural imperative of theirs. that he would be banned... in fact that whole conundrum is what preceded zzzzenu's latest alias change to optional777...

Quote from Tresor:

Momo,

I don't believe this. For sure the moderators share the simple and easy to understand ethics that a child rape cannot be justified or defended.
Regardless of what you believe, it doesn't make it any less true.

It was part of Joe's throw the baby out with the bath water approach to stopping their escalating arguments ( or whatever you want to call it).

Ethics had nothing to do with it. In fact if ethics were applied ZZzzzzz/Optional and ALL his alias' would have been permanently banned, and no one else.
 
Back
Top