if the government did not print there would be no revenue. all revenue was at one time printed as well. I suppose then you are decrying not printing per se, but the rate of printing. That seems like a valid concern to me. So your concern is with Congress which has 100% control over the annualized rate of printing. The Fed has no control over that. What specifically do you object to in Dodd-Frank?Dodd-Frank was an atrocity. And the money printing in recent years dwarves anything in '08.
Last edited: