Don Rickles made a career out of portraying a bigot. Made (millions?) making people laugh at people like you. People laughed because deep down they knew that Don loved and respected the people he made fun of having found a working balance between the insults, insinuations and actual interest in his comedic targets welfare.
I'm waiting for the other foot to drop that lets us know you are joking. Not holding my breath.
You should be happy that same-sex-lovers/fuckers (both male and/or female oriented) will eventually be needed to save the planet from overpopulation. You would need long range vision (like the Pope?), not short-sighted bigotry, to grasp how the respect of freedom could very well save untold suffering upon the planet, simply by limiting the rate of growth, or actually putting a cap on growth
naturally. By naturally i mean the preferences that are inherent with the entire population, from birth, or even through change...rather than the unnatural means of
war, or the natural, but painful effects of starvation, accidents, catastrophe (asteroids crashing into earth), disease, and traditional death scenarios. Of all the ways that the human population is limited, only one side-steps suffering, assuming emotional turmoil is inherent in any kind of human relationship.
This is only a long range vision if you agree overpopulation could be a concern. But if you believe that there is a kind of magic that can handle what is, or could become exponential growth due to the shear number of fuckers on the planet, then you may continue to issue fatwas as you wish. If you call yourself Christian, you offer more proof to my thesis that that father Judeo and mother Judeo-Christia have given birth to a wild child, Islam, and will reap what it has sown. It appears you prefer
war limit the worlds population.
- .
As a bigot, you have yet to explain exactly how or why a percentage of the population is not just mentally misaligned with physical gender markers, but who have both markers existing simultaneously in their bodily experience.
If you were the parent of one of a percentage of children born with both sets of genitals, or some semblance of each in-between, would you be one of those who make the "choice" for the child by cutting off (ordering surgery) one or the other sets of conflicting genitalia?
If so, you might be a red neck, (to borrow from Jeff Foxworthy).
I'm sure you've studied how human bodies formulate in the womb, and the interplay of chemicals, and how more or less of those chemicals, like estrogen and testosterone influence the outcome of the role played by the thing? I'm sure you've observed how the process is more analogue (more or less) than digital (on, off)? You haven't? Then you might be a red neck.
Given that the human experience, both mentally and physically, eventuates along a
continuum that runs from one extreme archetype to the other ("alpha male" to "alpha female" for example), i'm quite sure you realize (unless you are a bigot), that in a good number of cases, you simply could not tell the difference between one assumption and another. This was proven by the great scientist, Maury Povich, on TV, in front of millions.
A cock off is like a walk off, like in the movie Zoolander. I just don't have the time or interest to challenge you to be able to identify whether the "drop-dead" female walking in front of your face has a cock or not. But the chances are about 80% that you have already lusted, in your heart, for something that you either deny it's existence, or deny it's legitimacy relative to all the fuckers in the world.
Probably too, you have not realized just how much of a fetish it is, to imagine that "God is watching us", in the heterosexual "marriage bed". These, glorified fornicators, are fuckers too, the only difference they are adding to the population. Perhaps the Pope is just realizing this(?), leading the way out of the darkness of bigotry.
I am personally embarrassed, and a little concerned, that i have given so much support to the political right. It's a big tent, but i don't like the stench over there in the corner where they are still gnashing their teeth through gaping holes under their noses. Better that Trump, if he is a leader, keep walking in front of Pence, and not behind. Better that the Pope, if he is a leader, walk in front of the majority of hypocrites in his congregation. I really don't know Pence enough to figure where he stands on just this kind of hypocrisy, but i can see he is smart enough to keep his mouth shut, because it is certainly not Trump's policy to poke sticks at gender ambiguous role players.
Oh, and i do denounce your type.
