Quote from jimrockford:
The stock market is a competitive auction market, regulated in many respects, so that there are many types of protection for inexperienced traders. The reason you see so much promotion of FX trading is because the regulation of FX trading is far weaker than with other types of trading. This makes it easier for FX brokers to find new customer-meat and devour it. Why was Willie Sutton said to have robbed banks? "Because that's where the money is." Inexperienced traders need to learn the basics of how competitive auction markets work, which they cannot learn by trading with most FX brokers, since most FX brokers do not offer trading in a competitive auction market. New traders should get their feet wet in the more protected and more regulated environment of the stock market. They will, in the stock market, also enjoy the protection of SIPC deposit insurance, in case the broker goes out of business. If an FX broker goes out of business (other than Interactive Brokers which does give SIPC protection), then the customer can lose all his money. Another problem with FX trading is that inexperienced traders sometimes trade so poorly, that they lose far more than their deposit, and end up with a big surprise of owing large sums to their FX broker, who can sue their customers and take their assets and garnish their wages.
I can now see what you meant. It would certainly be better to trade in a fair market through honest broker. You right on a point that FX is not fair and honest at least at this moment for retail traders. In addition most of the FX brokers are placed in the countries where they use loop wholes in a local laws so that they would not be prosecuted for their malpractices. If brokers are in a country where the laws afford to protect customers of retail FX then they include every single provision in terms and conditions in order to expressly exclude the laws in question.
Therefore, each individual should check the terms very carefully as a single word substitute can make any protective provisions of law not applicable.
As far as losses are concerned I applied double safe rule. If you have $5000 risk capital, then don't trade to lose all of it because that is capital you could risk, but may be say if it drops to $2500 then without any question close the account and take what is left. It would be up to each individual to decide what they should lose. But in given example you still got $2500 giving you chance to trade elsewhere or invest in some other way and so on.
The issues that I had mentioned with Saxo are based on at least several month of observations and I simply could not disregard it all as a normal thing because the frequency was to often.
I have more details about Saxo but will post them at later stage.