Here's the news item...
Why would or should Tewksbury respond to the NY attorney general's subpoena? Tewksbury is a Bermuda company without US operations (that I know of). Not being a lawyer, I would think Spitzer only has power over the mutual funds allowing the late trades and then only if those mutual funds have NY investors.
What would happen if Tewksbury just refused to cooperate with Spitzer?
Spitzer Widens Investigation of Hedge Fund Late Trades
By Chidem Kurdas, New York Bureau Chief
Tuesday, September 09, 2003
NEW YORK (HedgeWorld.com)â New York attorney general Eliot Spitzerâs office subpoenaed around a dozen additional hedge funds in the ongoing inquiry into the trading of mutual fund stocks.
Tewksbury Capital Management is among the firms required to provide information on after-hours and short-term trading of mutual fund sharesâa special privilege allowed by mutual fund companies under quid pro quo arrangements that harmed long-term shareholders, according to the attorney general. Monroe Trout sold multi-billion dollar Tewksbury, formerly Trout Trading Management Co. Ltd., to chief executive Matthew Tewksbury last year.
etc. etc.
Why would or should Tewksbury respond to the NY attorney general's subpoena? Tewksbury is a Bermuda company without US operations (that I know of). Not being a lawyer, I would think Spitzer only has power over the mutual funds allowing the late trades and then only if those mutual funds have NY investors.
What would happen if Tewksbury just refused to cooperate with Spitzer?