Then I would offer a second criticism {"observation"??} being, that one of the things that clued me to the presentation likely being 'for real' was the comment of having flexibly placed entries being a good drop (long) or pop (short) away from the market, such that if you're entering long, you enter on a relatively unexpected downstroke, or if short, on a similar surprising upstroke. These give you plenty of time to either 1) harvest a tick or three as the market recovers to its prior path up (or down), or 2) that if things are gathering for a (short-term) reversal, you have plenty of time to either minimize the loss, get out flat, or even pick up a tick regardless of the 1-minute-to-5-minute trend. That is a trading policy that might *seem* so obvious, yet I have not seen it enunciated in general trading discussions. ("Weird.") And so, "Kudos!"
One coinciding idea here is that the market have sufficient "wash" to it -- which I define as, regardless of an overarching trend, a price action 'true range' that would let me reliably take ticks no matter of direction -- if I'm seeking only a single 0.25 tick, I want 0.75 to 1.00 to insure that when I enter, even if I'm wrong on direction, I can hold for a minute, and leave on the next wave, regardless of the tide.
The only thing that gets that wave action -- that "wash" -- is the ATR. BOY was I late in picking that up. BUT I DID! ("Woot!") Brought me solid results for a long time. AND, importantly, told me to stay the hell out of markets without sufficient wash: If you enter, you'll get trapped in the tar of it, and slowly killed.
There are many other scalper-appropo' lessons from watching an ATR through the day, but we'll save that for another time....