You should consider both criteria because no investor is truly risk neutral and if you have suffered significant drawdown you have to reduce your risk of ruin.
What do you think of adjusting the amount risked on a trade depending on the "quality" of the setup? ....
...
It is very subjective after all so how to tell in advance whether a trade is worth betting more?
...
...
Is the alternative approach of adjusting the risk based on current PnL better? As a day trader you are thinking in terms of profit for a particular day so it would make sense to risk more when you have a "cushion" of PnL built up in the day earlier that will protect you against hitting your daily loss limit.
...
....
I bet this post will read stupid after some sleep.
EDIT: I see a nice breakout just starting on the EURGBP on M15, someone go take this money, I'm too tired to do another
LOOK AT THIS ... wake up for the dogs and see I gave out a 90 pip move ... hope someone grabbed it ... was an easy $7,500
back to bed
You called it for upside right? Not the collapse afterwards?
I had a buy at .8955 under the button for a quick run to .897 ish... but I didn't pull the trigger... after that it pretty much collapsed on GDP figures though...
I make good money doing the following:
Put over 50% on a trade with stop below entry candle. Doesn't matter what the risk is.
I exit a day or 2 later (trading daily chart) wherever the period closes or am stopped out...
...I end up sabotaging my position and exit early (or late) while trying to make a winning trade....