Good points, especially the not knowing about the behind the scenes deals that were struck prior to the war. Personally, I think many Arab leaders were in favor of seeing Saddam removed and told the US leadership so quietly, but publicly stated opposition to the US in order not to endanger their own political positions.Quote from OPTIONAL777:
What if he targeted a very highly populated area like Tokyo?
Last resort, absolutely 100% last resort. This is very different.
Personally, I still think Kim is China's bitch, so it really is up to China what happens with him.
We would do nothing without China's approval. Bush is a cowboy, but he isn't stupid. His father was the head of the CIA for goodness sake, he knows all the real players.
Saddam was easy, he was a dead man walking anyway, as I have no doubt we got the go ahead from behind the scenes from the heads of OPEC before we went in. We have no idea what kind of deals were cut behind the scenes before this war began.
As much as Saddam is a loser here, France, Germany, and Turkey are the biggest losers.
Nothing like getting everybody else to tip their hand before you play your cards, is there?
I do not agree with your China approval theory. I take Bush and his cabinet at their word when they say our country's security policy will not be dictated by other nations. Furthermore, IMHO, I don't believe China would be so foolish as to intervene on the North's behalf as they did in the 50's. I think they understand us better now and would realize that A) Our intent would not be to move into China after disposing of Kim, and B) A capitalist Korea on her border may actually benefit her, in the way Hong Kong did/does. Perhaps that's an over-simplification, and perhaps I am giving the Chinese too much credit - or Bush, depending how you feel about him.
Those more familiar with East Asian affairs please chime in.
Just my .02.
