Training and education worked the past 30-50yrs when you had 10,000hrs (5,000hrs to breakeven), going forward the dynamics changed and you can double those numbers in to a more complex world.
We use a very specific pattern which interestingly works across all asset classes*, it's how institutional money flows in and out of assets, the wonders of architects who worked at the top Fortune 500.
Now, tracking 150 instruments across Forex, Futures, Stocks and 10 timeframes per instrument you have quite a lot of combinations, and no automation does not work without institutional support staffing.
Hence those with access pool the resources with the pattern, but, it's very few as the cost of entry is high, way too high for retail and most affluent, Elliott Wave is as close as you get using off the shelf tools.
*Well it's not quite that simple, you still need to know where the support/resistance/trends are which is where custom algos come in, you still need to spend 1/100th of the hrs to learn them
We use a very specific pattern which interestingly works across all asset classes*, it's how institutional money flows in and out of assets, the wonders of architects who worked at the top Fortune 500.
Now, tracking 150 instruments across Forex, Futures, Stocks and 10 timeframes per instrument you have quite a lot of combinations, and no automation does not work without institutional support staffing.
Hence those with access pool the resources with the pattern, but, it's very few as the cost of entry is high, way too high for retail and most affluent, Elliott Wave is as close as you get using off the shelf tools.
*Well it's not quite that simple, you still need to know where the support/resistance/trends are which is where custom algos come in, you still need to spend 1/100th of the hrs to learn them

Last edited: