to let us know how it performs in your "high demand" task.
Disk buffering system would still be needed on old laptop to navigate tick data.Correct.
In general, market charting/trading requires low power and minimal graphics.
But when you graph and archive tic data, especially on several/many issues, that's different. The CPU, GPU, RAM, and storage will be humping every second of the day. Not sure how much horsepower it would take to wrangle all of that without backlog delay... probably more than one would think.
My tick data files are usually under 10gb for 10years, even in reletively uncompressed format.
With good enough disk buffering system RAM might not need to be even over 2gb
On disk the data could be precalculated to efficient timing ratios to speed up access.
Modern monitor is just 2k pixels wide , so max you can display may be 2k data points at a time per instrument.
Why would task like this require fast pc...
The software used probably was never optimized for tick data?
Last edited:
