Thanks for the clarification because you made an opening statement about evidence you will provide and then later started mentioning specific sponsors. Hopefully, you can see why I concluded your specific mentioning of a sponsor by name in this thread would correlate with your opening statement. Anyways, you've now updated (clarification) about why you mentioned Thenuttrader and that they do not correlate with your opening statement even though you do indeed have a personal opinion about them scamming newbies.
By the way, there's an existing thread for personal opinions about newbies being scammed in the Education Resources thread @ http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?t=212110
Simply, I think you should keep this thread true to your words involving your opening statement to only involve those that you have facts (you said you would provide proof) via evidence through documents that detail guilty pleas, law suits, convictions, reprisals, warnings or sanctions by regulators while not discussing others that you have no facts via such. Yet, if you do mention others that you do not correlate with your opening statement...at least make it clear (not after someone ask you about it) that you have no facts and that its your "belief" or "personal opinion" that newbies are being scammed.
This will prevent newbies and other members from thinking in error that every time you mention a specific sponsor by name in this thread...you indeed do have facts (evidence) that you will share without having to be prompt to reveal such evidence.
By the way, you didn't answer my question...who is your data vendor and broker ?
I ask because there was a similar like thread like this a long time ago where someone considered herself as a vigilante but she refused to name her own broker and data vendor. Eventually she did and she continue using them after someone else posted links to lawsuit judgements against your broker.
By the way, there's an existing thread for personal opinions about newbies being scammed in the Education Resources thread @ http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?t=212110
Simply, I think you should keep this thread true to your words involving your opening statement to only involve those that you have facts (you said you would provide proof) via evidence through documents that detail guilty pleas, law suits, convictions, reprisals, warnings or sanctions by regulators while not discussing others that you have no facts via such. Yet, if you do mention others that you do not correlate with your opening statement...at least make it clear (not after someone ask you about it) that you have no facts and that its your "belief" or "personal opinion" that newbies are being scammed.
This will prevent newbies and other members from thinking in error that every time you mention a specific sponsor by name in this thread...you indeed do have facts (evidence) that you will share without having to be prompt to reveal such evidence.
By the way, you didn't answer my question...who is your data vendor and broker ?
I ask because there was a similar like thread like this a long time ago where someone considered herself as a vigilante but she refused to name her own broker and data vendor. Eventually she did and she continue using them after someone else posted links to lawsuit judgements against your broker.

