Quote from vladiator:
Most maybe. But to me it's the TA that does have logic and that is objective that is most valuable. That's the only kind of TA I ever use. I do look at other popular things at times just to see what the herd is seeing so I can know what they are likely to do.
You might be right. I am 99.99% contrarian and what I do is a mixture of some TA and some FA. I think I'm somewhere on the boundary between the two where it's really murky as to what it's called.
Me too..I only want to use TA that is objective and make sense in some manner, which is why I went systematic...
.