Hi Baron,
It would be useful that when a thread has been started by someone on one's Ignore List that the thread itself doesn't even appear as a topic in the various lists on Forum. That'd be my first choice.
Another perhaps more generally acceptable alternative might be to include (in parentheses) the originator's name along with the thread's subject line in the forum lists.
Or merely flag that topic with an asterisk to show the reader that a particular thread was started by someone on the Ignore List.
Those of us who appreciate the Ignore List feature then wouldn't waste our time drilling down into new topics (such as "Soy milk proven safe on Atkins") only to realize immediately that it won't be of any interest to us because some idiotlogue (sic) is using it as a clever springboard to bash dairy cattle ranching in, oh you guessed it, Crawford, Texas with yet another lame emotionalist and vituperative screed, heard once, heard a hundred times.
However you convey the information to save us the distraction would be fine; I've got no dog in the fight as to the specific remedy, other than the obvious one.
Thanks for your consideration. I don't envy your job.
It would be useful that when a thread has been started by someone on one's Ignore List that the thread itself doesn't even appear as a topic in the various lists on Forum. That'd be my first choice.
Another perhaps more generally acceptable alternative might be to include (in parentheses) the originator's name along with the thread's subject line in the forum lists.
Or merely flag that topic with an asterisk to show the reader that a particular thread was started by someone on the Ignore List.
Those of us who appreciate the Ignore List feature then wouldn't waste our time drilling down into new topics (such as "Soy milk proven safe on Atkins") only to realize immediately that it won't be of any interest to us because some idiotlogue (sic) is using it as a clever springboard to bash dairy cattle ranching in, oh you guessed it, Crawford, Texas with yet another lame emotionalist and vituperative screed, heard once, heard a hundred times.
However you convey the information to save us the distraction would be fine; I've got no dog in the fight as to the specific remedy, other than the obvious one.
Thanks for your consideration. I don't envy your job.
