If u had a great track record, what prop firm would be ur 1st choice for backing?

Quote from Swan Noir:

Imdustrial espionage, by and large, is meant to fugure out what your competition is working on now that will be released next year ... not to figure out what they released last year. A freakin' nine year old can figure that out!

And who said we were talking about a truly original idea? It could well be a tweak (or two tweaks) to an idea that many know about but those tweaks could be working gangbusters now. Those tweaks could be the afterburners. Nothing lasts forever but no one in their right mind wants to shar something about a trade is very profitable in an instrument like CL that has limited liquidity at times.

And we are not talking about cavemen. We are taking about guys that own prop firms and have access to other guys that went to schools like MIT and CalTech. Cavemen? Not so much. Why throw out the straw man argument and make a fool of yourself? Just sit tight and shut up until you see a subject you know something about.
How the fuck would YOU know what industrial espionage is "restricted to"? If a company is kicking their competition's ass right now with some new product, the competition isn't concerned about next year. The want to know what is goin on right now. A freakin' six year old can figure that out.

The reason you don't know we're talking about an original idea is because you know fuckall about creating an indicator. You live under the nitwitted delusion that whatever shit strategy you're suffering with right now is only "a tweak or two" away from some "dynamite methodology.". ROTFLMAO!

As somebody who has actually seen a real trend indicator, I will tell you this much: it looks nothing Ike MACD, it looks nothing like ADX, it looks nothing like anything in the pubic domain.

A "tweak or two". LMAO!
 
Quote from kut2k2:

You can put a caveman on inventing a rocket ship, that doesn't mean he will succeed. Reverse engineering a truly original idea is the stuff of hack science fiction stories, not real life. If reverse engineering was so easy, there would be no need for industrial espionage. Just look at what the competition is doing better than you and magically "figure it out". LOL

What if you put a NASA scientist/scientists on reverse engineering a rocket ship?

There were no rocket ships when cave people were alive.
No cave people when rocket ships were made.

A cave person might be able to reverse engineer a spear used to hunt for his dinner.
 
You really are the best. I say "by and large" and you come back with the misquote "restricted to" every single argument you make is a straw man. I never once mention an indicator and you tell me "you don't know fuckall" about creating an indicator.

Right or wrong an argument makes no sense when you insist on misquoting. The process falls apart.

Quote from kut2k2:

How the fuck would YOU know what industrial espionage is "restricted to"? If a company is kicking their competition's ass right now with some new product, the competition isn't concerned about next year. The want to know what is goin on right now. A freakin' six year old can figure that out.

The reason you don't know we're talking about an original idea is because you know fuckall about creating an indicator. You live under the nitwitted delusion that whatever shit strategy you're suffering with right now is only "a tweak or two" away from some "dynamite methodology.". ROTFLMAO!

As somebody who has actually seen a real trend indicator, I will tell you this much: it looks nothing Ike MACD, it looks nothing like ADX, it looks nothing like anything in the pubic domain.

A "tweak or two". LMAO!
 
Back
Top