Making this simple, if you deploy money, and you wanna take money from the market, there have to be someone that at least loose the same ammount you are trying to take out...
Not exactly and often not the case.
You can lose $1500 and then 3 people can win $500 each. Therefore, just because you lost $1500 does not imply there's one person out there that profited $1500.
Now take this further into reality in the age of algorithms. You could have a losing trade of $1500 and then 15 algorithm systems from around the world could each have $100 profit.
The goal in trading, if you're a profitable trader, the money you make (profit)...you remove
"some of it" from the game...put it in your bank account, pay bills, pay your kids education or whatever. The rest of those profits, put it back into the market so that your account can grow.
You do this because the odds are high for retail traders to not be able to benefit from their profits or eventually one day lose those profits and much more...resulting in the end of the game. Therefore, if you been pulling
"some of those profits" out of the market and benefiting from those profits...the sting is a lot less when the end game occurs.
Keep some of those profits and then if you lose the next time around...those on the other side of the trades did not get all of it. Simply, the net change in your benefit is
not zero because you were able to keep some of those profits and then use them (e.g. pay bills, pay off your credit cards...essential things that needs to get done).
Reality, futures have transaction costs. Your transaction
costs is most likely higher or lower than those on the other side of your trades. That reason alone is why your loss or profits + costs is
never equal to those on the other side of your trades because their costs are different.
By the way, those costs is more than just commissions and fees...something you'll understand at tax time.
