I agree. However, I DO use standard indicators, but not with standard settings. More specifically, I am interested in horizontal support and resistance, simple moving averages, and typical price ranges as defined by simple moving average envelopes.I work based on mathematical models, so I don't use any standard indicator, no s/r, no divergence, etc...But in fact a lot of indicators are based on mathematical models, as indicators are the graphical presentation of mathematical models...
The funny thing is that I am really not a genius in math, so having the right idea, or concept, seems to be more important than being a Phd in math or science.
Took me about 10 years to reach this point, and it was never my intention to built what I build. The outcome was the unintentional result of trying to make some money in trading by entering as close as possible to the optimal entrypoint to limit the losses. At the same time the signals had to be right most of the time as wrong signals would cost me a lot of money.
However, I have no use for convergence/divergence, or the traditional chart patterns, candlestick formations, relative strength index, etc., mentioned by tomorton as not-very-helpful conventional tools for technical analysis. I agree with him in that respect. Really, what I am interested in is the overall market structure, or as schweiz put it...using indicators as the graphical presentation of mathematical models.