Quote from patrick_newB:
Give it a try and let us know how you do.
Quote from patrick_newB:
My findings were that to benefit from this you basically have to autoquote the futures market, and hope to get a fill on a futures spike that isn't "real" or that isn't mirrored in the cash market. The risk is that you get filled on the futures and the spike is real on the cash, so you become exposed to fill risk on the cash side of things before you can get an execution.
Quote from scalpmaster:
That's exactly the point. I am looking for strategies that are
close to zero market exposure (not necessary zero) but at the
same time balance by risk/opportunities that oscillate for a swing
trade.
(If possible, any kind of spreads even between 3 pairs/trios that widens and close in less than a month).
Quote from Buy1Sell2:
Chasing this idea is a waste of time. No offense intended to you guys trying to discuss it.
Quote from illiquid:
None taken at all. Just trying to point out that there is no "idea" to chase here in the first place.
A couple of threads like this have popped up lately, maybe retail fx shills trying to drum up interest with phantom "arbitrage"?
Quote from illiquid:
Why do you need to be "short spot/long future" to take advantage of a price "shock" that brings one market out of line with the other? The idea is along the same lines of all those threads that advocate "going long EUR/USD and short EUR/USD at the same time, and take advantage of/close out profitably whichever position spikes first". It's just an extra round trip that's completely unnecessary for the objective of the trade.
If the futures go out of whack momentarily from where the premium/discount should be compared with spot, you just buy/sell the futures, then close out the position once the market gets "back in line" -- a quick scalp. You don't need to be hedged with spot, or more specifically, the spot hedge won't matter, you will just have an extra position to close out once you've taken advantage of the futures getting out of line.