Do most of you agree with this statement?

Quote from 5yrtrader:

To me this statement says that fundamentals are completely useless. Fundamentals take over a month in the future? So in a month there will be a new set of technicals drving the markets currently, but fundamentals will take over in the future.

Basically technicals drive the markets NOW and fundamentals drive the market sometime in the non-existent future. Does that make sense to anyone else?

I feel people, collectively, drive the markets. Their plans and actions take data into account. The diversity of such plans blankets the market in proportion the their capitalization.

Actions cause the dynamic we all enjoy. It is an amazing process to see something so huge as the financial industry continually moving in the face of the larger economic global system.

What is so very fotunate is that individuals can tap the total potential of the dynamic without affecting it within reasonable limits.

The present where all money making takes place keeps pushing the future behind it. Wouldn't be neat if we had at least one indicator that took into account the future as much as it took into account the past. Who's keeping all the future data unavailable, anyway?
 
Back
Top