oh and about shortboy.com
go back and deduct all the interest income he gives himself and you will discover his performance is, well, how shall I put this diplomatically?....not that good
I e-mailed him early on (when he started the site 2 years ago) and asked him why he was adding interest income to his p/l? His reply? "Because I deserve it"
I don't agree. In order to get a true picture of his **trading** ability you need to look at his trading p/l not his interest income.
Its like me deluding myself by including IB's interest income from my daily cash balance. Sure! it would be nice, but I would be deluding myself.
Ofcourse, shortboy has a bigger job as he has to delude many others as well as himself:
In 1999 his interest income: 30205 his total income 114105
So 26% of his profit was not from trading
In 2000 his interest income: 36136.5 his total income 129479
So 28% of his profit was not from trading
In 2001 (so far) int income: 12767 his total income 22550
So 57% of his profit was not from trading
If we deduct his interest income from his trading income we get the following returns:
In 1999 8.39% He claims 11.4% [note: half year from June]
In 2000 18.67% He claims 25.9%
In 2001 1.96% (so far) He claims 4.5%
As you can see, no big woop. Especially when you remember that last year short funds were like kids in a candy store.
source of stats http://www.shortboy.com
I have nothing against shorboy but I believe the way he presents his performance is misleading because he compares himself to the S&P500. As far as I know you don't get paid interest income for holding that index.
BTW, he will from this month start charging for his picks.
go back and deduct all the interest income he gives himself and you will discover his performance is, well, how shall I put this diplomatically?....not that good
I e-mailed him early on (when he started the site 2 years ago) and asked him why he was adding interest income to his p/l? His reply? "Because I deserve it"
I don't agree. In order to get a true picture of his **trading** ability you need to look at his trading p/l not his interest income.
Its like me deluding myself by including IB's interest income from my daily cash balance. Sure! it would be nice, but I would be deluding myself.
Ofcourse, shortboy has a bigger job as he has to delude many others as well as himself:
In 1999 his interest income: 30205 his total income 114105
So 26% of his profit was not from trading
In 2000 his interest income: 36136.5 his total income 129479
So 28% of his profit was not from trading
In 2001 (so far) int income: 12767 his total income 22550
So 57% of his profit was not from trading
If we deduct his interest income from his trading income we get the following returns:
In 1999 8.39% He claims 11.4% [note: half year from June]
In 2000 18.67% He claims 25.9%
In 2001 1.96% (so far) He claims 4.5%
As you can see, no big woop. Especially when you remember that last year short funds were like kids in a candy store.
source of stats http://www.shortboy.com
I have nothing against shorboy but I believe the way he presents his performance is misleading because he compares himself to the S&P500. As far as I know you don't get paid interest income for holding that index.
BTW, he will from this month start charging for his picks.
