You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Charlie Sheen Hit With Restraining Order from Ex-Wife
- Thread starter Pabst
- Start date
Quote from Maverick74:
Yeah dude and OJ Simpson is innocent too. Oy vey.
"So the police just happened to conduct a "sex sting" operation against the one man who had exposed the lies of our war-mad rulers from the inside. On the eve of war, as hundreds of thousands protest in the streets, this staunch Republican and solid family man who has become one of the War Party's most formidable enemies is suddenly "exposed" as a child molester.
Since the court records have been sealed, and the case was merely "adjourned in contemplation of dismissal," the authorities will say nothing, at least in public. The entrapment was apparently so transparent, so obviously the clumsiest sort of Cointelpro-style operation badly bungled by our newly-empowered political police, that the charges were dropped to the legal equivalent of a traffic ticket. Could it be that the records were sealed not to protect Ritter, but to protect whomever tried to set him up?
Anybody who doesn't believe that Ritter was specifically targeted on account of his political activities needs to seek help: that sort of naivete can be terminal, and the patient probably shouldn't be trusted to cross the street unattended."
Quote from ratboy88:
"So the police just happened to conduct a "sex sting" operation against the one man who had exposed the lies of our war-mad rulers from the inside. On the eve of war, as hundreds of thousands protest in the streets, this staunch Republican and solid family man who has become one of the War Party's most formidable enemies is suddenly "exposed" as a child molester.
Since the court records have been sealed, and the case was merely "adjourned in contemplation of dismissal," the authorities will say nothing, at least in public. The entrapment was apparently so transparent, so obviously the clumsiest sort of Cointelpro-style operation badly bungled by our newly-empowered political police, that the charges were dropped to the legal equivalent of a traffic ticket. Could it be that the records were sealed not to protect Ritter, but to protect whomever tried to set him up?
Anybody who doesn't believe that Ritter was specifically targeted on account of his political activities needs to seek help: that sort of naivete can be terminal, and the patient probably shouldn't be trusted to cross the street unattended."
Look, I don't doubt that he was setup no more then I don't doubt that most of the pedophiles on the Dateline exposes are setup as well. I'm sure they went after him.
But answer me this batman, what was Scott Ritter doing on the internet in a chat room agreeing to meet a 12 year old boy at a McDonalds? The setup is not what bothers me, the fact that Ritter Thought he was meeting a young child does.
Quote from Maverick74:
Look, I don't doubt that he was setup no more then I don't doubt that most of the pedophiles on the Dateline exposes are setup as well. I'm sure they went after him.
But answer me this batman, what was Scott Ritter doing on the internet in a chat room agreeing to meet a 12 year old boy at a McDonalds? The setup is not what bothers me, the fact that Ritter Thought he was meeting a young child does.
you have no proof of this.... absolutely no proof.
Wouldn't it be nice to see the actual transcript before reaching a conclusion as to Ritter's motives?
The stung Ritter, obviously, and even if he was innocent, and the meeting were innocent...the damage that they hoped for was done.
That's how the right wing works, they are masters of the smear tactics....
The stung Ritter, obviously, and even if he was innocent, and the meeting were innocent...the damage that they hoped for was done.
That's how the right wing works, they are masters of the smear tactics....
Quote from Maverick74:
Look, I don't doubt that he was setup no more then I don't doubt that most of the pedophiles on the Dateline exposes are setup as well. I'm sure they went after him.
But answer me this batman, what was Scott Ritter doing on the internet in a chat room agreeing to meet a 12 year old boy at a McDonalds? The setup is not what bothers me, the fact that Ritter Thought he was meeting a young child does.