Originally posted by vladiator
If what I find is what you suggest - that A implies B in 100% of cases and never ever can I impute from that that B is implied by A - that's a great result in itself.
I'm not implying that at all! In fact, A can be implied from B with the same regularity that a string of heads on a coin toss can imply that the next toss will be heads or tails -- 50%! And 50% accuracy is not a reliable system.
Try watching KLAC on the Level 2 screen for ten minutes and you'll see what I mean!