Quote from Pabst:
Just because the administration asserts enemy combatants can be detained indefinitely or that telephone conversations of foreign nationals monitored, does not a dictatorship make.
I contend that a presidential dictatorship isn't a function of what laws are broken, but how laws are broken.
If a president can make a regular practice of violating our laws, what function does the legislative body serve? That's what dictators do, subjugate government and laws to concentrate their power