Funny you posted this. Tell you the truth, I think AMP is being honest about their connection. the reason I say this is because I did about 3.5 hours' worth of recording AMP's MT5 vs. AxiomaticAI's MT5. Guess which one was off? Neither. They were exactly the same. Guess which one matched CQG Desktop / CQG-Quantower perfectly? Neither. lol.
MT5 is the issue. I've been just beaming yesterday and today watching everything through my CQG/Quantower interface as I await my final fixes to be made to my charting for QT. Quantower is ridiculously fast. for the first time in awhile I actually feel like I'm seeing true market speed lol.
I make this point because Axio was very insistent on saying they are directly connected to CQG with their MT5. I don't doubt this. it's just that when I put theirs up against AMP's MT5, both quotes were directly in-step. but neither MT5 was in-step with CQG Desktop nor Quantower via CQG. I can only assume by now that MT5 itself is the issue.
regardless, it was a good breakup yesterday with MT5. onward with QT. AMP is solid as any FCM can be and the margins are unbeatable.
Yea, I'm not blaming AMP at all. But I'm sure AMP is paying metaquotes for the platform access and if they know it has issues, I'm sure they have more power to compell Meta to change or look into this.
I only care if the platform matches CQG. CQG is the datafeed so I take it as the true price. Yes, CQG has issues, but at least I want to have that synchronization between my algo platform and CQG. I can live in ignorant bliss after that when that happens lol.
Like I said, I want to move away from MT5, maybe to ninjatrader, maybe quantower, maybe multicharts..god I don't know. The process of finding a developer and "moving" is such a pain in the ass.