Am I missing anything obvious?

As others have said the weekend is giving you a completely unrealisitc diagram. Vol needs to be recalculated using trading days. Friday/Monday vol trades on the index will always appear to be an "arbitrage" in calendar day volatility but it's just a bad model. Contracts are priced in trading days, not calendar days.
 
From the short legs yes, but I think the long legs would be at a loss of around 50$, so the total for the combo would be negative for about 14$, approx market close estimation: (59.40 open - 34.40 close) X2 - 36 (stradlle)

That's why I only mentioned the profit on the short straddle:

Well you would've made some money on the short straddle.

For the long strangles though, I wouldn't give up just yet on the volatility. I have seen some crazy moves on Sunday ATH that sometimes even extend all the way to Monday close, especially when Friday is an extremely flat NFP day. During the March NFP day this year, the move from Friday close to next Monday close was 3+%. So you never know about this past NFP. Your long call is already $10 ITM. We shall see.
 
That's why I only mentioned the profit on the short straddle:



For the long strangles though, I wouldn't give up just yet on the volatility. I have seen some crazy moves on Sunday ATH that sometimes even extend all the way to Monday close, especially when Friday is an extremely flat NFP day. During the March NFP day this year, the move from Friday close to next Monday close was 3+%. So you never know about this past NFP. Your long call is already $10 ITM. We shall see.
We can keep an eye hypothetically, but it's not a position I would like to find myself in.
 
We can keep an eye hypothetically, but it's not a position I would like to find myself in.

It's not easy being long on volatility, that's for sure. They are highly unpredictable. The problem is the vol. crush can crush you if you stay in the position but vol. can also explode after you cash out so you lose all the potential profit.

And even market-moving economic events are no guarantees for volatility I find.
 
Last edited:
I understand that payoff charts are relative with calendars and diagonals.

Is there anything wrong with a structure like this?

Should I maybe worry about volatility contraction for the long legs?

even if the intention would be to be flat by short expiry?

View attachment 298777

IMO, double calendar strangs/strads NEVER work out as well as they kind of look. I dabbled in them briefly recently, even landing right on some targets, and still just broke even.
If you pick them right it's hard to lose much, especially since front options are quite a bit higher vol, but for some reason it fails IRL.
 
Back
Top