A Tale of Two Posts
In the "Resources" forum, "rosw" (located in Singapore) was looking for FX magazines, first thing Monday morning (EST):
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=56822
I posted a concise reply, consisting of:
1) 1 sentence that I didn't think any of his listed (expensive) magazines would make a positive difference to his P&L.
2) 1 sentence with a link to free Currency Trader magazine online.
3) The word "Enjoy."
Within 2 hours (possibly much less) my reply was gone. OK. No big deal. Chances are, rosw, among others, had already seen it.
Here's the mystery part. Presumably after my reply had been deleted, another reply with an identical link to the same free Currency Trader magazine website was posted, about 2 hours after the original inquiry and my reply. That reply is still there, 24 hours later. (Which is great, for any potential reader.)
I don't understand the moderator's rationale for swiftly deleting one post, while leaving a nearly identical post alone. Shouldn't ET rules on external links be applied consistently? At least within a given forum, i.e, by the same moderator or moderator team.
Would appreciate some sort of a clue. Thanks.
In the "Resources" forum, "rosw" (located in Singapore) was looking for FX magazines, first thing Monday morning (EST):
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=56822
I posted a concise reply, consisting of:
1) 1 sentence that I didn't think any of his listed (expensive) magazines would make a positive difference to his P&L.
2) 1 sentence with a link to free Currency Trader magazine online.
3) The word "Enjoy."
Within 2 hours (possibly much less) my reply was gone. OK. No big deal. Chances are, rosw, among others, had already seen it.
Here's the mystery part. Presumably after my reply had been deleted, another reply with an identical link to the same free Currency Trader magazine website was posted, about 2 hours after the original inquiry and my reply. That reply is still there, 24 hours later. (Which is great, for any potential reader.)
I don't understand the moderator's rationale for swiftly deleting one post, while leaving a nearly identical post alone. Shouldn't ET rules on external links be applied consistently? At least within a given forum, i.e, by the same moderator or moderator team.
Would appreciate some sort of a clue. Thanks.