d08 Jun 28, 2023 #21 M.W. said: Also switched to polars. It's more performant than pandas 2.0 but I find the filter and select syntax on columns awkward. More... At first I felt the same but I realised it's only because I had gotten used to Pandas. Now for most things, Polars seems more concise.
M.W. said: Also switched to polars. It's more performant than pandas 2.0 but I find the filter and select syntax on columns awkward. More... At first I felt the same but I realised it's only because I had gotten used to Pandas. Now for most things, Polars seems more concise.
M M.W. Jun 28, 2023 #22 Oh for sure, polars is way more concise, but so is Kx (kdb). It comes down to learning curves. For a once written code that's not an issue but for daily profiling it surely takes time to get used to. d08 said: At first I felt the same but I realised it's only because I had gotten used to Pandas. Now for most things, Polars seems more concise. More...
Oh for sure, polars is way more concise, but so is Kx (kdb). It comes down to learning curves. For a once written code that's not an issue but for daily profiling it surely takes time to get used to. d08 said: At first I felt the same but I realised it's only because I had gotten used to Pandas. Now for most things, Polars seems more concise. More...
G goodgoing Jul 5, 2023 #23 Impressive, but take a look at this classic article that changed my whole view about millions of backtests.
Impressive, but take a look at this classic article that changed my whole view about millions of backtests.
