Search results

Your overall probability is your long term trade win ratio. Per trade probability is contextual and will require in depth analysis, you'll have to develop that for yourself since it will rely on your trading patterns.

Here's mine. Looks a bit more realistic. Not giving it away for free though. ;]

EU, currencies.

40$ is the bottom price floor to expect in general?

I'm looking for low power, but high reliability VPS for Forex. It's just going to feed quotes into another data center which will do data processing. Yes, i want to separate services on purpose for various reasons.

That is called front running orders, it gives some edge, but you can achieve 80% win rate on just retail data.

Except you get an additional leverage on capital, depending on the firm between 1:10 and 1:20 after profit split. If you don't have 20x of capital, props are fine. Like I said earlier you need some math to grasp the additional risk/benefit mechanism.

Legit, if you can do basic math to follow the rules.

Correct, if you view CHATGPT or other hot in the news model (commercially promoted) as somewhat generally competent, trading AI would/should be equipped with single talent.

I've created an AI system for currency trading. It took thousands of hours of learning, research and many late nights to make it work just for this one purpose. I've done some exploration of semantic AI systems, some overlap with CHATGPT, and from my experience i don't think it's anywhere close...

Obviously, if you fail at human factor AND your trading method is bad there's no way to win.

I trade currencies, if that's your fancy. Custom built AI algorithmic system, thousands of hours worth of work and research. If you put down the money, i'll work purely on profit split.

The "patterns" are a myth, just hieroglyphs of stock markets. Chart looks like a pattern until it doesn't or it's a pattern post factum only as a description of what happened. Or it may be a pattern, but only with a certain eye squint. You can't rely on one type of thinking here, you need to...

IF your idea or trading mechanism is consistent, but your trading fails at human factor, then algorithmic trading is the way to go. However most people prefer to lose their money by hand, so to speak. Algorithm will always be biased to market conditions in which it performs best, just the...

Brute force attack on the number space search of those parameters. You're incapable of creating such an attack so can't even imagine it, so you feel safe with simple trick obfuscation. You're giving the idea away. Just learn to code.

There's one angle you're missing. There's definitely people around who try at this when it's well above their capability. Let's say i have a "do-nothing-at-all" system, it's $100 per month. Guaranteed to beat most traders.

Diversify, 25k on few contracts. You go heavy per contract when you run out of trade ideas.

Eh, i'm selling, as a service actually. Nobody wants to buy or expects a kidney in escrow as a collateral. Conflict of interest in an 80% failure industry. It's a hard sell.

I provided service, resources and my time for free for a week. You call me a liar over agreement disagreement while hiding behind conditional promise.

The 2 days was separated by 3 working days and a weekend. During which i was working on fixing the initial roll out of the cloud based system. Time and server cost exclusively needed for running a sim. That was the original agreement, yes. The original agreement was also about up to three month...