Search results

And? Free markets are switched for free money. What's wrong with that? :) It's not really serving anyones purpose to take the money out of the system and deal with high unemployment and lower standard of living. Real inflation (relative to income) will be bigger actually.

Why not just go with the flow and accept the fact that when central banks are pro gdp growth and low unemployment then the result can only be higher stock market? If you saved and just bought the index every month with part of your salary, you'd be ahead of the curve. There is no such a thing...

Easy, 1) stop allowing hedge funds to buy real estate as an investment. 2) Stop allowing foreigners to buy real estate as an investment. Or just tax both so returns becomes unattractive. It'll change the inflation profile, tho. Other products/services become that much more expensive then...

If you care about long only strategies then just sell long term puts (on SP500 for example) and assume delivery should the market trade down. Don't use leverage and be ready to add another short put should the market trade -10% down. You get the benefit of high vola should the market trade down...

where do you find those, tho?

Art is nothing but an advanced science. You'll figure that out once AI technology improves to a level where magic starts to happen.

probably that's the word yeah, english is not my native.

You scan for a strategy that matches a certain period of time in the past. How difficult is that? This activity is the main scamming method for subscriptions, lessons, EA marketing etc.

I'll make it simpler. If 90% of retail traders lose money how can the market be random? Shouldn't they be losing 50% of the time + spreads and commissions? Yeah, eventually, the account still blows up but the reality is that it happens way faster than merely because of spreads and comms. So...

This time you have previous high at 69k. That changes things. You just know that there are bunch of FOMO interest at and above that. Value is a religion. I learned this the hard way. There is no rationality in valuations. You could say that gold is just as pointless but it has a market cap of...

You really should not short it. It can easily trade above 100k before coming to your short target.

You have tons of patterns in your brain (both long and short ones) and perhaps you just pick the right ones after the fact? Brains are notoriousily famous in pattern recognition analysis.

If those 90% degenerates would win then some other traders would need to lose. This isn't because markets are random. Someone has to lose either way. It just happens to be them because gambling and consistency usually don't go together. If markets where clearly predictable for the majority...

LMAOO

You've posted your question confusingly. Did you mean whether the next bar is green or red after close or do you mean if the vola of the next bar is high or low?

I think i misrepresented. I very often have MORE than 1 position open (using that 500k as an example). I should've said, per strategy. But still, the notional is definitely below account size. Going leverage'd isn't something i like. I have a better idea. It doesn't make any sense either should...

Or average up :) But yeah, If your strategy is about averaging down then you wouldn't be getting positive sortino with this trade count.

I had a whole paragraph written against your "trend following" algos and what not technical analysis and how that does NOT AT ALL make up the bids and asks but i decided to skip it. Now you corrected yourself a little bit by talking about arbs and i will just add that more so dynamic arbs in...

Thanks. A little over 6 months. Contract sizes (margin modelling) are optimized to a comfortable level. Strategy optimization is key to improvement. You know the saying: It's not the size that matters, it's how you use it, lol.